Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wiki13: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:07, 3 January 2012 edit89.100.150.198 (talk) Nominative Determinism← Previous edit Revision as of 12:50, 3 January 2012 edit undoWiki13 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers13,481 edits Nominative Determinism: +reNext edit →
Line 51: Line 51:


:Removing original research is *not* vandalism. Please refer to ]. ] (]) 00:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC) :Removing original research is *not* vandalism. Please refer to ]. ] (]) 00:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

:: As far I see in the article's history there's editwar going on, and i would suggest a protection for this page until there's consensus for removing the content by the IP. ] (]) 12:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:50, 3 January 2012

Welcome on my talkpage! A few things before you post here:

  • Please sign your comment with four times a ~
  • Make a question / comment about a new subject by clicking New section
  • If you notice me about an article, create a wiki link to the article
  • Questions or comments which are made here, I will answer HERE

King regards, Wiki13

Your question will be answered as quickly as possible

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page! Cheers! Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 21:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

No problem, Wiki13 (talk) 13:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You beat me to vandalism!

A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 10:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! Wiki13 (talk) 10:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Please provide sources

On page http://en.wikipedia.org/Space:_Above_and_Beyond the contributor provided no sources. the section is high speculative and presented as fact. Unless you plan to provide the sources for the contributor the section should rightfully be removed. Please provide sources or stop reverting articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.145.228 (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi anonymous user, you're right. I have removed that section because it has any sources. Wiki13 (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

RVV

Please do not revert constructive changes without a comment. Thanks 99.120.200.86 (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello anynomous user, links to websites like youtube will soon or later be removed because they add nothing to the article itsself. Wiki13 (talk) 19:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I award this barnstar to u for your hard work & fight against vandalism like recently u reverted the vandalism in A Touch of Frost (TV series) -----  RahulMothiya (Talk) 13:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Nominative Determinism

Hey there, as a recent editor of Nominative determinism I'm letting you know if you're not watching the page that an anonymous IP editor is intent on consistently deleting content from it, so if you're up to it, it'd be great if you could monitor any changes on that page to minimize this vandal's impact. Cheers! JesseRafe (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Removing original research is *not* vandalism. Please refer to WP:NOTVAND. 89.100.150.198 (talk) 00:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
As far I see in the article's history there's editwar going on, and i would suggest a protection for this page until there's consensus for removing the content by the IP. Wiki13 (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)