Misplaced Pages

Alliance for Automotive Innovation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:55, 3 January 2012 editScheinwerfermann (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,205 editsm Safety standards: rework link for clarity← Previous edit Revision as of 17:35, 4 January 2012 edit undoDennis Bratland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,245 edits reword to be more specific about where and how they were "successful" re: light trucks. move ref down per WP:LDRNext edit →
Line 45: Line 45:


The ] led to increased market share for ], which were often more ]. In response to this trend, ] and the ] union accused importers of ] and unfair trading, and took their claims to trade authorities.<ref name=Millet>{{cite news |title=Ralph Millet, who brought Saab to U.S., dies |first=Jim |last=Henry |newspaper=Automotive News |date=30 July 2002}}</ref> AIA represented the importers and succeeded in having the case dismissed in 1975, arguing that other factors led to the market-share changes.<ref name=Importers/> The ] led to increased market share for ], which were often more ]. In response to this trend, ] and the ] union accused importers of ] and unfair trading, and took their claims to trade authorities.<ref name=Millet>{{cite news |title=Ralph Millet, who brought Saab to U.S., dies |first=Jim |last=Henry |newspaper=Automotive News |date=30 July 2002}}</ref> AIA represented the importers and succeeded in having the case dismissed in 1975, arguing that other factors led to the market-share changes.<ref name=Importers/>

The organization helped its members formulate and defend a free trade position against legislative and regulatory developments that discriminated against international automakers in favor of traditional American automobile companies. In 1994, AIAM successfully fought the classification of the ] as a cargo vehicle, which effectively raised the import tariff on this and similar vehicles from 2.5% to 25% based on a 1989 law.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ruling May Further Open U.S. Auto Market to Japan |first=James |last=Bennet |newspaper=The New York Times |date=8 September 1994}}</ref> During the 1990s, AIAM opposed a move by the ] to impose a 100% tariff on 13 luxury vehicles imported from Japan.<ref>{{cite news |title=Japanese trade fight alarms dealers |first1=Alec Matthew |last1=Klein |first2=Melody |last2=Simmons |newspaper=The Baltimore Sun |date=18 May 1995}}</ref> The organization helped its members formulate and defend a free trade position against legislative and regulatory developments that discriminated against international automakers in favor of traditional American automobile companies. In 1994, AIAM won a ruling in the ] against the classification of the ] as a cargo vehicle, which had effectively raised the import tariff on this and similar vehicles from 2.5% to 25% based on a 1989 law.<ref name=Bennet1994/> The ruling, affirming a 1993 decision by the ], opened the door to Japanese expansion in the US ] market, in particular the growing ] (SUV) segment, which in the 1990s had much higher profit margins than economy cars.<ref name=Bennet1994/><ref name=Schoenberger/> During the 1990s, AIAM opposed a move by the ] to impose a 100% tariff on 13 luxury vehicles imported from Japan.<ref>{{cite news |title=Japanese trade fight alarms dealers |first1=Alec Matthew |last1=Klein |first2=Melody |last2=Simmons |newspaper=The Baltimore Sun |date=18 May 1995}}</ref>


Starting in the 1980s, international automobile companies that were traditionally importers began opening new manufacturing plants in the U.S.,<ref>{{cite news |title=Imports at home in U.S. |first=Andre |last=Mouchard |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |date=19 February 1995}}</ref> leading to an expansion in the organization's lobbying focus. Starting in the 1980s, international automobile companies that were traditionally importers began opening new manufacturing plants in the U.S.,<ref>{{cite news |title=Imports at home in U.S. |first=Andre |last=Mouchard |newspaper=Chicago Tribune |date=19 February 1995}}</ref> leading to an expansion in the organization's lobbying focus.
Line 74: Line 75:


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|30em}} {{reflist|30em|refs=
<ref name=Bennet1994>{{cite news |title=Ruling May Further Open U.S. Auto Market to Japan |url= http://www.nytimes.com/1994/09/08/business/ruling-may-further-open-us-auto-market-to-japan.html |accesssdate= January 4, 2012 |first=James |last=Bennet |newspaper=The New York Times |date=8 September 1994}}</ref>
<ref name=Schoenberger>{{cite news|url=http://blog.cleveland.com/business/2008/06/as_buyers_shun_suvs_expect_to.html |first=Robert |last=Schoenberger |title=As buyers shun SUVs, expect to pay more for that small car |newspaper=Cleveland Business News |date=2008-06-06 |accessdate=2010-11-16}}</ref>
}}


==External links== ==External links==

Revision as of 17:35, 4 January 2012

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (December 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Misplaced Pages's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (December 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article contains promotional content. Please help improve it by removing promotional language and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view. (December 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The examples and perspective in this article may not include all significant viewpoints. Please improve the article or discuss the issue. (December 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Global Automakers
File:Global Automakers Logo.JPG
Formation1965
TypeLobby group
Location
Websiteglobalautomakers.org

The Association of Global Automakers (Global Automakers), formerly known as the Automobile Importers of America and Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, is a Washington, D.C.-based lobby group for foreign automobile and light duty truck manufacturers that build and sell products in the United States. It represents 15 international manufacturers, including Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai and Kia. As of September 2011, 33.8% of autos manufactured in the U.S. are produced by Global Automakers’ members. The organization lobbies politicians and government regulators on behalf of member companies, carries out research and analysis, publishes information, and performs public relations, related to US laws and regulations that impact the automotive industry in the United States. Global Automakers is also active in initiating lawsuits, and in intervention in others' suits, in support of the member companies' goals.

History

The Automobile Importers of America (AIA) was officially formed in 1965. In its early years the organization provided member companies with information on changes to U.S. state and federal regulations that affected the automotive industry. AIA evolved into the primary advocacy resource for many major vehicle importers in the 1970s, opposing trade restrictions and other protectionist laws and regulations that adversely impacted its members.

The 1973 oil crisis led to increased market share for imported vehicles, which were often more fuel-efficient. In response to this trend, Ford Motor Company and the United Auto Workers union accused importers of dumping and unfair trading, and took their claims to trade authorities. AIA represented the importers and succeeded in having the case dismissed in 1975, arguing that other factors led to the market-share changes.

The organization helped its members formulate and defend a free trade position against legislative and regulatory developments that discriminated against international automakers in favor of traditional American automobile companies. In 1994, AIAM won a ruling in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit against the classification of the Nissan Pathfinder as a cargo vehicle, which had effectively raised the import tariff on this and similar vehicles from 2.5% to 25% based on a 1989 law. The ruling, affirming a 1993 decision by the United States Court of International Trade, opened the door to Japanese expansion in the US light truck market, in particular the growing sport utility vehicle (SUV) segment, which in the 1990s had much higher profit margins than economy cars. During the 1990s, AIAM opposed a move by the Clinton administration to impose a 100% tariff on 13 luxury vehicles imported from Japan.

Starting in the 1980s, international automobile companies that were traditionally importers began opening new manufacturing plants in the U.S., leading to an expansion in the organization's lobbying focus.

In 1990 the organization changed its name to the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM). In 2011, the organization changed its name again to the Association of Global Automakers.

Membership

As of 2011 the Association has 15 automaker members including Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai and Kia; the Association says its members accounted for 42% of all vehicles sold in the U.S and 34% of vehicles manufactured in the U.S. from January to September 2011.

Advocacy, lobbying, & litigation

The Association advocates, lobbies, involves itself in litigation affecting the auto market, and provides information to member companies on a range of legislative and regulatory matters affecting the automotive industry.

Fuel formulation

In late 2010, the Association together with other complainants sued the United States Environmental Protection Agency to block that agency's approval of E15—a blend of 15% ethanol and 85% gasoline—for general distribution as motor fuel. The Association based their objection on a lack of solid data to assure the alcohol-blended fuel would not cause damage or problems in vehicles not originally built to run on such fuels.

Fuel economy and emissions

During the last decade, the Association has been developing positions for its members on fuel efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions and other regulations and standards. In particular, the association favors national rather than state-by-state regulation of vehicle emissions and fuel economy, and supports the Obama administration's proposed changes to CAFE standards. In 2007, the Association sued the state of California, contending it should not be allowed to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles—and lost. The following year, the Association issued a statement supporting the EPA's decision to block California's attempt to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.

Mobile phones

The Association advocates a ban on the use of hand-held devices to text or talk while driving as "an important part of vehicle crash prevention", though hands-free phones are equally deleterious to driver attention and performance.

Consumer protection

The Association has lobbied against the Motor Vehicle Owners' Right to Repair Act.

Safety standards

The Association has advocated a restrained, "cautious" approach to making safety standards more stringent or adding new ones, but has also advocated for U.S. regulators to begin recognizing some of the ECE Regulations used instead of U.S. regulations throughout most of the industrialized world.

References

  1. ^ Roland, Neil (24 January 2011). "Foreign-brand automaker lobby changes name". Automotive News.
  2. ^ "Global Automakers Production and Sales Report September 2011" (PDF). globalautomakers.org. Global Automakers. September 2011. Retrieved 21 October 2011.
  3. ^ "Global Automakers' Stanton Calls For Coordinated Regulatory Processes to Encourage Efficiencies". States News Service. 27 January 2011.
  4. ^ Kurylko, Diana T. (30 October 1989). "Importers shift focus from trade to clean air and CAFE". Automotive News.
  5. Henry, Jim (30 July 2002). "Ralph Millet, who brought Saab to U.S., dies". Automotive News.
  6. ^ Bennet, James (8 September 1994). "Ruling May Further Open U.S. Auto Market to Japan". The New York Times. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |accesssdate= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  7. Schoenberger, Robert (2008-06-06). "As buyers shun SUVs, expect to pay more for that small car". Cleveland Business News. Retrieved 2010-11-16.
  8. Klein, Alec Matthew; Simmons, Melody (18 May 1995). "Japanese trade fight alarms dealers". The Baltimore Sun.
  9. Mouchard, Andre (19 February 1995). "Imports at home in U.S.". Chicago Tribune.
  10. "New name for import group". Chicago Tribune. 6 May 1990.
  11. "Global Automakers Open New Washington Office". States News Service. 26 January 2011.
  12. Japan's Carmakers, Long Quiet in Washington, Flex Their Muscles
  13. Lobbyist Public Search
  14. "Michael J. Stanton, AIAM President & CEO Releases Statement on the Notice of Intent to Issue Proposed Passenger Vehicle Fuel Efficiency & Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Model Years 2017, 2025". Professional Services Close-Up. 6 October 2010.
  15. Engine Makers Sue to Block E15 Fuel
  16. Comments by AIAM on E15 EPA Petition
  17. Global Automakers Endorses Administration’s Next Round of New Greenhouse Gas/Fuel Economy Standards for MY 2017 – 2025 Vehicles
  18. Hakim, Danny (10 April 2007). "Challenge to Emissions Rule Is Set to Start". The New York Times. p. 19A.
  19. Roland, Neil (9 May 2011). "Obama's challenge: Unite groups on emissions targets for 2017-25". Automotive News. p. 27.
  20. Roland, Neil (13 June 2011). "Industry split on interim review of mpg standards". Automotive News. p. 8.
  21. Friedman, Thomas L. (5 December 2011). "This is a big deal". The International Herald Tribune. p. 11.
  22. A green light for rules on emission output
  23. Judge Rejects Automakers' Lawsuit
  24. AIAM Statement on Final EPA Decision Denying California Waiver
  25. AIAM Supports Ban on Texting and the Use of Hand-Held Phones While Driving
  26. Understanding the Distracted Brain
  27. Txt Responsibly Fact Sheet
  28. Lobbyists Line Up Over Right to Repair Act
  29. U.S. finding on Toyota cuts automakers a break
  30. Automotive Trade Groups Urge Global Safety Standards

External links

Categories: