| Revision as of 06:44, 4 January 2012 editJohnny Squeaky (talk | contribs)2,359 edits →Whisper Systems← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:45, 4 January 2012 edit undoJohnny Squeaky (talk | contribs)2,359 edits →Bias of AFD debate - Florence Brudenell-BruceNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :::Please find "more productive" things to do other than commenting on my talk page! =//= ] 07:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC) | :::Please find "more productive" things to do other than commenting on my talk page! =//= ] 07:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Yes massa. Now you please play nice and stop being disruptive. ] (]) 03:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC) | ::::Yes massa. Now you please play nice and stop being disruptive. ] (]) 03:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Thank you for illustrating my point so much more perfectly than I ever could! Case closed |
:::::Thank you for illustrating my point ''so much more perfectly than I ever could!'' '''Case closed!''' =//= ] 17:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Merry Christmas! == | == Merry Christmas! == | ||
Revision as of 06:45, 4 January 2012
Whisper Systems
I reverted an edit of yours that removed a decent source for the page above. I'm not sure why you thought it was irrelevant, as you said in your edit summary; the independent source clearly identifies the company and provides some information about why Twitter was interested in acquiring them. Please be more careful when removing information based on sourced content. I, Jethrobot (note: not a bot!) 06:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- The Misplaced Pages story is about Whisper Systems, not one or a handfull of their possibly 100,000 of users. As well, it's POV, politically. Can-o-worms. By the way, I have ZERO interest in "WikiLawyering". =//= Johnny Squeaky 19:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Bias of AFD debate - Florence Brudenell-Bruce
I have reverted your unhelpful edit of the article Florence Brudenell-Bruce which is currently under an AFD debate. If you had read the rules of WP:AFD, you would have noticed that such large edits while an AFD debate is ongoing as not seen as at all productive to the debate, and are in fact highly disruptive. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Why is it that some "editors" here feel the need to be SOOOO RUDE? There are many theories... =//= Johnny Squeaky 03:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above editor wasn't being rude at all, and their claim that your edit was "not seen as at all productive" is actually a very nice way of putting it. Please don't cry foul when no foul is committed. Drmies (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please find "more productive" things to do other than commenting on my talk page! =//= Johnny Squeaky 07:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes massa. Now you please play nice and stop being disruptive. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for illustrating my point so much more perfectly than I ever could! Case closed! =//= Johnny Squeaky 17:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes massa. Now you please play nice and stop being disruptive. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please find "more productive" things to do other than commenting on my talk page! =//= Johnny Squeaky 07:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above editor wasn't being rude at all, and their claim that your edit was "not seen as at all productive" is actually a very nice way of putting it. Please don't cry foul when no foul is committed. Drmies (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
Happy new year! |
| we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year! Pass a Method talk 20:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |