| Revision as of 22:15, 7 April 2006 editSpangineer (talk | contribs)Administrators16,440 edits →[]: support← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:26, 7 April 2006 edit undoJournalist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,932 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Fuck yeah!!!''' (]) I was wondering when you (EM) were gonna nominate this article. It has been through so much, but thanks to EM's persistence, it now meets all the FA criteria (in fact, its even better than most featured articles, I can guarantee that). ]] ] ] ] 21:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | *'''Fuck yeah!!!''' (]) I was wondering when you (EM) were gonna nominate this article. It has been through so much, but thanks to EM's persistence, it now meets all the FA criteria (in fact, its even better than most featured articles, I can guarantee that). ]] ] ] ] 21:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **Misplaced Pages may not be censored, but that doesn't mean we can't be professional. —]<sup>]]</sup> <small><font color="brown">]</font></small> 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | **Misplaced Pages may not be censored, but that doesn't mean we can't be professional. —]<sup>]]</sup> <small><font color="brown">]</font></small> 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ***Sorry, just going through one of my rebellious phases. But, still, what's a little spicy language, eh?]] ] ] ] 22:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Support''' - I've looked over this article, and found it written with adequet writting style (IMO), all images have propper fair use rationals or are PD. It is also sufficiently referenced, and covers the topic quite broadly. Featured quality. ] 21:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | *'''Support''' - I've looked over this article, and found it written with adequet writting style (IMO), all images have propper fair use rationals or are PD. It is also sufficiently referenced, and covers the topic quite broadly. Featured quality. ] 21:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support'''. This is truly excellent. High-quality references, top-notch formatting (one of only a few FACs that I don't have to touch!), and comprehensive, discussing her music, her musical career, and her biography. Would-be authors of articles on music icons, take note. —]<sup>]]</sup> <small><font color="brown">]</font></small> 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | *'''Support'''. This is truly excellent. High-quality references, top-notch formatting (one of only a few FACs that I don't have to touch!), and comprehensive, discussing her music, her musical career, and her biography. Would-be authors of articles on music icons, take note. —]<sup>]]</sup> <small><font color="brown">]</font></small> 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:26, 7 April 2006
Mariah Carey
Self-nomination. This article languished until a cleanup operation initiated by user:FuriousFreddy last October, and myself and a few other editors have been working on it ever since. We've tried to incorporate comprehensive (but not excessively detailed) material on the significant aspects of Carey's life and career, and I now believe that it meets the featured article criteria. It has been the subject of two peer reviews, which can be found here and here. Special thanks to user:Rossrs for creating the sound samples. Extraordinary Machine 15:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support, A very well written article. i checked all the pics and sound clips, they all have fair-use, and the sections are well written. Vulcanstar6 19:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support, I was wondering when someone was going to nominate it. Very strong and comprehensive article.--Fallout boy 21:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: this is just me being nit-picky, and once my question is answered, I'll more than likely support the nomination. Perhaps one of Carey's remixes that first presented her collaborations with hip hop artists should be included as a sound sample (such as "Fantasy" or "Always Be My Baby")? Just a thought. —Eternal Equinox | talk 21:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know how to create sound samples, so you might want to ask user:Rossrs about that. Sorry. Extraordinary Machine 21:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Fuck yeah!!! (pardon my French) I was wondering when you (EM) were gonna nominate this article. It has been through so much, but thanks to EM's persistence, it now meets all the FA criteria (in fact, its even better than most featured articles, I can guarantee that). Oran e (t) (c) (e) 21:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages may not be censored, but that doesn't mean we can't be professional. —Spangineer (háblame) 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support - I've looked over this article, and found it written with adequet writting style (IMO), all images have propper fair use rationals or are PD. It is also sufficiently referenced, and covers the topic quite broadly. Featured quality. Fieari 21:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support. This is truly excellent. High-quality references, top-notch formatting (one of only a few FACs that I don't have to touch!), and comprehensive, discussing her music, her musical career, and her biography. Would-be authors of articles on music icons, take note. —Spangineer (háblame) 22:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)