| Revision as of 06:17, 14 February 2012 editPolisher of Cobwebs (talk | contribs)29,147 edits linking in article names should be avoided← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:26, 14 February 2012 edit undoPolisher of Cobwebs (talk | contribs)29,147 edits Rmv picture. Poorly chosen, since it has no obvious or direct relevance to this article, which does not discuss DelacroixNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| The study was written by ]'s colleague and biographer ], following on from Freud's own commentary on the play in Chapter V of '']'' (1899). | The study was written by ]'s colleague and biographer ], following on from Freud's own commentary on the play in Chapter V of '']'' (1899). | ||
| ] and Jones suggested that an ] ] caused Hamlet's hesitations. (Artist: ] 1844).]] | |||
| In particular, Jones explains Hamlet's mysterious ] as a consequence of the ]: the son continually postpones the act of revenge because of the impossibly complicated psychodynamic situation in which he finds himself. Though he hates his fratricidal uncle, he nevertheless unconsciously identifies with him—for, having killed ] and married ], ] has carried out what are Hamlet's own unconscious wishes. In addition, marriage to Hamlet's mother gives the uncle the unconscious status of the father—destructive impulses towards whom provoke great anxiety and meet with repression. | In particular, Jones explains Hamlet's mysterious ] as a consequence of the ]: the son continually postpones the act of revenge because of the impossibly complicated psychodynamic situation in which he finds himself. Though he hates his fratricidal uncle, he nevertheless unconsciously identifies with him—for, having killed ] and married ], ] has carried out what are Hamlet's own unconscious wishes. In addition, marriage to Hamlet's mother gives the uncle the unconscious status of the father—destructive impulses towards whom provoke great anxiety and meet with repression. | ||
Revision as of 06:26, 14 February 2012
| Author | Ernest Jones |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Genre | Drama, bibliography |
| Publisher | Norton |
| Publication date | 1949, 1976 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 166 |
| ISBN | 0393007995 |
| OCLC | 1974123 |
| Dewey Decimal | 822.3/3 |
| LC Class | PR2807 .J63 1976 |
Hamlet and Oedipus is a study of William Shakespeare's Hamlet in which the titular character's famously inexplicable behaviours are subjected to investigation along psychoanalytic lines.
The study was written by Sigmund Freud's colleague and biographer Ernest Jones, following on from Freud's own commentary on the play in Chapter V of The Interpretation of Dreams (1899).
In particular, Jones explains Hamlet's mysterious procrastination as a consequence of the Oedipus Complex: the son continually postpones the act of revenge because of the impossibly complicated psychodynamic situation in which he finds himself. Though he hates his fratricidal uncle, he nevertheless unconsciously identifies with him—for, having killed Hamlet's father and married his mother, Claudius has carried out what are Hamlet's own unconscious wishes. In addition, marriage to Hamlet's mother gives the uncle the unconscious status of the father—destructive impulses towards whom provoke great anxiety and meet with repression.
Jones' investigation was first published as "The Oedipus-Complex as An Explanation of Hamlet's Mystery: A Study in Motive" (in The American Journal of Psychology, January 1910); it was expanded to form a book-length study (Hamlet and Oedipus) in 1949.
External links
- http://www.shakespeare-navigators.com/jones/ A summary of and the complete text of Jones' 1910 essay which expanded into his 1949 book, Hamlet and Oedipus.
- Information at www.answers.com