Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:12, 15 February 2012 editInTheRevolution2 (talk | contribs)202 edits KEEP!← Previous edit Revision as of 00:44, 16 February 2012 edit undoFetchcomms (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,593 edits +Next edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
Unremarkable micronation. Have tried redirecting to ] (Prior AfD was mistakenly closed as no consensus, when it should have been '''merge''', based on comments from regular contributors), but constantly reverted by accounts with few edits outside this topic. Majority of the references are to primary sources or user-submitted sites - little significant coverage from independent sources. Google news search on shows no results. Standard search shows mainly unreliable sources, wikis, and primary sources - again, no significant coverage found. ] (]) 16:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Unremarkable micronation. Have tried redirecting to ] (Prior AfD was mistakenly closed as no consensus, when it should have been '''merge''', based on comments from regular contributors), but constantly reverted by accounts with few edits outside this topic. Majority of the references are to primary sources or user-submitted sites - little significant coverage from independent sources. Google news search on shows no results. Standard search shows mainly unreliable sources, wikis, and primary sources - again, no significant coverage found. ] (]) 16:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:'''Keep''' - The sources are notable. Also, I don't find any evidence that any of the sources were self-published. ] (]) 20:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC) :'''Keep''' - The sources are notable. Also, I don't find any evidence that any of the sources were self-published. ] (]) 20:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
::It doesn't matter how notable the sources are or by whom they were published if they don't establish that Austenasia meets the ]. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/]]]'''</span> 00:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>] (]) 18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>] (]) 18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>] (]) 18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>] (]) 18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 00:44, 16 February 2012

Austenasia

AfDs for this article:
Austenasia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable micronation. Have tried redirecting to List of micronations (Prior AfD was mistakenly closed as no consensus, when it should have been merge, based on comments from regular contributors), but constantly reverted by accounts with few edits outside this topic. Majority of the references are to primary sources or user-submitted sites - little significant coverage from independent sources. Google news search on "Austenasia" shows no results. Standard search shows mainly unreliable sources, wikis, and primary sources - again, no significant coverage found. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep - The sources are notable. Also, I don't find any evidence that any of the sources were self-published. InTheRevolution2 (talk) 20:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
It doesn't matter how notable the sources are or by whom they were published if they don't establish that Austenasia meets the inclusion criteria. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Categories: