Misplaced Pages

Joseph T. Thomas: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:05, 10 April 2006 editStuart Drewer (talk | contribs)311 edits caps, ft: He was acquitted of providing resources that would assist in a terrorist act.← Previous edit Revision as of 02:34, 5 May 2006 edit undo128.250.6.244 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Joseph Terrence Thomas''' (b. ]) is an Australian criminal, convicted of receiving funds from ]. He was acquitted of providing resources that would assist in a terrorist act. Thomas is the first Australian to be convicted under anti-terrorism laws introduced in Australia after the ] in New York. <ref name=thomas_age>, ], February 26, 2006</ref> Thomas was sentenced on ], 2006 to 5 years prison with a non-parole period of two years. <ref name=thomas_news>, ], March 31, 2006</ref> '''Joseph Terrence Thomas''' (b. ]) is an Australian convicted of receiving funds from ]. He was acquitted of providing resources that would assist in a terrorist act. Thomas is the first Australian to be convicted under anti-terrorism laws introduced in Australia after the ] in New York. <ref name=thomas_age>, ], February 26, 2006</ref> Thomas was sentenced on ], 2006 to 5 years prison with a non-parole period of two years. <ref name=thomas_news>, ], March 31, 2006</ref>


] ] said after news of the conviction, ] ] said after news of the conviction,
Line 6: Line 6:


This was in relation to his travels to ] and ], after he married and converted to ]. Since his arrest, Thomas has been referred to in the media as 'Jihad Jack' because when he converted to Islam he took on the name Jihad. This was in relation to his travels to ] and ], after he married and converted to ]. Since his arrest, Thomas has been referred to in the media as 'Jihad Jack' because when he converted to Islam he took on the name Jihad.

Thomas's lawyer, Rob Stary described the not guilty verdicts on the more serious charges as a "significant victory".

The trial was highly controversial, as the evidence used to prosecute Thomas consisted solely of an interview conducted in a Pakistani military prison. Despite claims that the evidence was obtained under duress and that Thomas had been tortured, the judge deemed the interview to be admissable.

The defence described the prosecution as a "trophy trial", as it was seen to be motivated by the Australian government's desire to find a 'home grown' terrorist to legitimise anti-terror legislation it had introduced in previous months, and to shore up public support for Australia's involvement in the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
==References== ==References==
<!--The referencing mechanism used on this page is explained at ].--> <!--The referencing mechanism used on this page is explained at ].-->

Revision as of 02:34, 5 May 2006

Joseph Terrence Thomas (b. 1973) is an Australian convicted of receiving funds from Al-Qaeda. He was acquitted of providing resources that would assist in a terrorist act. Thomas is the first Australian to be convicted under anti-terrorism laws introduced in Australia after the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York. Thomas was sentenced on March 31, 2006 to 5 years prison with a non-parole period of two years.

Attorney General Philip Ruddock said after news of the conviction,

"The convictions of Mr Thomas for the terrorist offence and the offence related to passport manipulation demonstrate the seriousness with which these issues are dealt with by the law and highlights the consequences of becoming involved in these activities".

This was in relation to his travels to Pakistan and Afghanistan, after he married and converted to Islam. Since his arrest, Thomas has been referred to in the media as 'Jihad Jack' because when he converted to Islam he took on the name Jihad.

Thomas's lawyer, Rob Stary described the not guilty verdicts on the more serious charges as a "significant victory".

The trial was highly controversial, as the evidence used to prosecute Thomas consisted solely of an interview conducted in a Pakistani military prison. Despite claims that the evidence was obtained under duress and that Thomas had been tortured, the judge deemed the interview to be admissable.

The defence described the prosecution as a "trophy trial", as it was seen to be motivated by the Australian government's desire to find a 'home grown' terrorist to legitimise anti-terror legislation it had introduced in previous months, and to shore up public support for Australia's involvement in the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.

References

  1. ^ Thomas convicted under terror laws, The Age, February 26, 2006
  2. Thomas sentenced under terror laws, News.com.au, March 31, 2006


Flag of AustraliaBiography icon

This Australian biography article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: