Misplaced Pages

User talk:PsiEpsilon: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:10, 21 February 2012 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,410 editsm Signing comment by Anagogist - "Properties of Bradyons AfD: new section"← Previous edit Revision as of 21:13, 21 February 2012 edit undoAnagogist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users528 editsm sinebot is exceedingly quickNext edit →
Line 51: Line 51:
== ] AfD == == ] AfD ==


Hello, just letting you know that I submitted ] to ] for deletion. The article makes a very good point about the distinction between massive particles and bradyons if tachyons do exist, but its content is too specific to warrant an article, and so I merged the content to ]. I also reverted your change to the ] redirect: ]'s original name was '''Baryon''', hence the redirect. You might want to be careful in the future about editing redirects. Feel free to comment in the article's AfD ]. -21:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Hello, just letting you know that I submitted ] to ] for deletion. The article makes a very good point about the distinction between massive particles and bradyons if tachyons do exist, but its content is too specific to warrant an article, and so I merged the content to ]. I also reverted your change to the ] redirect: ]'s original name was ''Bradyon'', hence the redirect. You might want to be careful in the future about editing redirects. Feel free to comment in the article's AfD ]. -] (]) 21:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:13, 21 February 2012

December 2011

Hi and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your recent edits on the Sandbox have been reverted, as they appear to be a misuse of the sandbox (ie. adding CSD templates to the page). Please read the instructions and rules of the Sandbox carefully, before you make edits to it again. Thank you, -- -- MSTR 07:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, PsiEpsilon, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- MSTR 08:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Issues with your edits

There are multiple problems with this recent edit of yours:

  • It is essential that you use edit summaries, especially for significant changes such as proposeing an article for deletion.
  • The article was already proposed for deletion once, and it is not allowed to use PROD twice on the same article
  • When you propose an article for deletion, you should add a message about it to the talk pages of significant past editors of the same article, so that they can become aware of the prod in time to contest it.
  • You did not provide a valid reason for the deletion,

Please do better in future. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about it. Then how do I find out if a page has previously been suggested to be deleted?PsiEpsilon (talk) 06:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Exterior algebra

Hi, I've noticed that you keep changing part of exterior algebra from the Euclidean plane to C. I've mentioned on the discussion page that the section makes no sense over the complex: it is essential that it be real. Sławomir Biały (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 16:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Properties of Bradyons

The article Properties of Bradyons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The content of this article is already part of Massive particle, which is itself a stub. Why not improve that one instead?

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RockMagnetist (talk) 06:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Properties of Bradyons AfD

Hello, just letting you know that I submitted Properties of Bradyons to AfD for deletion. The article makes a very good point about the distinction between massive particles and bradyons if tachyons do exist, but its content is too specific to warrant an article, and so I merged the content to Massive particle. I also reverted your change to the Bradyon redirect: Massive particle's original name was Bradyon, hence the redirect. You might want to be careful in the future about editing redirects. Feel free to comment in the article's AfD discussion page. -Anagogist (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)