| Revision as of 05:00, 23 February 2012 editFordmadoxfraud (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers22,910 edits →Additions to the lede: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:56, 23 February 2012 edit undoMothballX (talk | contribs)21 edits →Additions to the ledeNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| I recently removed new additions to the lede by ]. For two reasons: 1) because they essentially recapitulated information found elsewhere in the article, and, perhaps more importantly, 2) because it is speculation. The article talks about the speculation and theorizing regarding the circumstances around Trentadue's death, but it's just that: unsupported conspiracy theorizing. Not that I think it has no place in the article! But I think in general it is best to cleave to ], and let the facts speak for themselves. The lede should represent factual, verifiable information. ] (]) 05:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC) | I recently removed new additions to the lede by ]. For two reasons: 1) because they essentially recapitulated information found elsewhere in the article, and, perhaps more importantly, 2) because it is speculation. The article talks about the speculation and theorizing regarding the circumstances around Trentadue's death, but it's just that: unsupported conspiracy theorizing. Not that I think it has no place in the article! But I think in general it is best to cleave to ], and let the facts speak for themselves. The lede should represent factual, verifiable information. ] (]) 05:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::According to ] the lede is supposed to establish notability and provide a brief summary of the main points in the article. Prior to my additions it accomplished neither of these goals, now it does both. I have kept the intro NPOV. Everything I added to the introduction is supported by sources. Nothing there specifically says there was a conspiracy, just that some people believe there was and use the two other suicides as evidence of this. --] (]) 05:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:56, 23 February 2012
 |
Kenneth Michael Trentadue is currently a Law good article nominee. Nominated by MothballX (talk) at 21:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
 | Biography Start‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | A fact from Kenneth Michael Trentadue appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,008 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Additions to the lede
I recently removed new additions to the lede by User:MothballX. For two reasons: 1) because they essentially recapitulated information found elsewhere in the article, and, perhaps more importantly, 2) because it is speculation. The article talks about the speculation and theorizing regarding the circumstances around Trentadue's death, but it's just that: unsupported conspiracy theorizing. Not that I think it has no place in the article! But I think in general it is best to cleave to WP:LEDE, and let the facts speak for themselves. The lede should represent factual, verifiable information. Ford MF (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- According to WP:LEDE the lede is supposed to establish notability and provide a brief summary of the main points in the article. Prior to my additions it accomplished neither of these goals, now it does both. I have kept the intro NPOV. Everything I added to the introduction is supported by sources. Nothing there specifically says there was a conspiracy, just that some people believe there was and use the two other suicides as evidence of this. --MothballX (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)