| Revision as of 18:12, 26 February 2012 view sourceJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,438 edits →Interaction ban between Ferahgo the Assassin and Mathsci: support← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:54, 26 February 2012 view source Aprock (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,805 edits →Discussion by othersNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| ===Discussion by others=== | ===Discussion by others=== | ||
| I'm confused as to what problem this motion is supposed to solve. Could one of the nominators explain how this helps the project instead of hurting it. From the best I can tell the pros and cons look something like: | |||
| * '''pro''': Ferahgo is no longer bothered by Mathsci's investigation into issues of meat puppetry and off wiki harassment by her and others. | |||
| * '''con''': Ferahgo and her clique of off-wiki associates can now recruit disruptive editors more freely. | |||
| Given the degree to which this topic area is besieged by disruptive editors (12 new editors warned/sanctioned since case close 10 months ago), an implicit invitation for more disruptive editors seems counter productive. ] (]) 18:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:54, 26 February 2012
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open cases| Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motions| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Interaction ban between Ferahgo the Assassin and Mathsci | 26 February 2012 |
Motions
 | Shortcuts
This page can be used by arbitrators to propose motions not related to any existing case or request. Motions are archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Motions. Only arbitrators may propose or vote on motions on this page. You may visit WP:ARC or WP:ARCA for potential alternatives. Make a motion (Arbitrators only) You can make comments in the sections called "community discussion" or in some cases only in your own section. Arbitrators or clerks may summarily remove or refactor any comment. |
Interaction ban between Ferahgo the Assassin and Mathsci
Ferahgo the Assassin (talk · contribs) and Mathsci (talk · contribs) are banned from interacting with, or, directly or indirectly, commenting on each other on any page in Misplaced Pages, and editing any article to the effect of undoing or manifestly altering a contribution by the other party except on Arbitration Enforcement and Arbitration Committee Request/case pages where either (or both) are an involved party, Requests for Comment/User where either or both are a party, or similar pages where their comments are requested. Should either account violate their bans, they may be blocked for up to one week. After the fifth such violation, the maximum block length shall be increased to one month. The ban is indefinite, but for not less than 6 months - after which either party may request review or both may agree to request the lifting or suspension of the ban.
- Support
- Oppose
- Abstain
- Recuse
- Comments
Discussion by arbitrators
Discussion by others
I'm confused as to what problem this motion is supposed to solve. Could one of the nominators explain how this helps the project instead of hurting it. From the best I can tell the pros and cons look something like:
- pro: Ferahgo is no longer bothered by Mathsci's investigation into issues of meat puppetry and off wiki harassment by her and others.
- con: Ferahgo and her clique of off-wiki associates can now recruit disruptive editors more freely.
Given the degree to which this topic area is besieged by disruptive editors (12 new editors warned/sanctioned since case close 10 months ago), an implicit invitation for more disruptive editors seems counter productive. aprock (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)