Misplaced Pages

Wiktionary: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:34, 11 April 2006 view sourcePrimetime (talk | contribs)3,581 edits Comparison to other sister projects: + 2 other differences← Previous edit Revision as of 06:35, 11 April 2006 view source Primetime (talk | contribs)3,581 editsm Comparison to other sister projectsNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
One difference between Wiktionary and Misplaced Pages is that pages beginning with ] and ] letters can refer to different things. For example, the entries on lowercase "]" and uppercase "]" are distinct. All of the existing entries in the English Wiktionary were converted to lowercase automatically in mid-]; manual intervention is being used to move pages to uppercase as necessary. One difference between Wiktionary and Misplaced Pages is that pages beginning with ] and ] letters can refer to different things. For example, the entries on lowercase "]" and uppercase "]" are distinct. All of the existing entries in the English Wiktionary were converted to lowercase automatically in mid-]; manual intervention is being used to move pages to uppercase as necessary.


Another difference is regarding verifiability. Some editors have interpreted Wiktionary's ] as meaning that a single reliable source is enough to prove a word's usage. Others, however, say that only three quotations will suffice, despite the fact that the page states that "Usage in a well-known work" qualifies as proof. These same editors claim that other dictionaries do not count. To many Misplaced Pages users accustomed to citing disputed assertions with a single source, having to cite three sources is upsetting and unwelcoming. Many entries have been deleted because they have only had one or two sources. Another difference is regarding verifiability. Some editors have interpreted Wiktionary's ] as meaning that a single reliable source is enough to prove a word's usage. Others, however, say that only three quotations will suffice, despite the fact that the page states that "Usage in a well-known work" qualifies as proof. These same editors claim that other dictionaries do not count. To many Misplaced Pages users accustomed to citing disputed assertions with a single source, having to give three sources is upsetting and unwelcoming. Many entries have been deleted because they have only had one or two sources.


Yet another difference is the lack of policies on Wiktionary. Many Misplaced Pages policies, such as the ] and ] are not policies on Wiktionary. To some users from Misplaced Pages, this makes the site seem like it is ], and makes many administrator decisions seem arbitrary, as well. Yet another difference is the lack of policies on Wiktionary. Many Misplaced Pages policies, such as the ] and ] are not policies on Wiktionary. To some users from Misplaced Pages, this makes the site seem like it is ], and makes many administrator decisions seem arbitrary, as well.

Revision as of 06:35, 11 April 2006

Wiktionary logo

Wiktionary is a Wikimedia Foundation project intended to be a free wiki dictionary (including thesaurus and lexicon) in every language. It is a sister project to Misplaced Pages.

Mission

Wiktionary serves to:

History

It was set up on December 12, 2002 following a proposal by Daniel Alston. On March 29, 2004 the first non-English Wiktionaries were initiated in French and Polish. Wiktionaries in numerous other languages have since been started. Wiktionary was hosted on a temporary URL until May 1, 2004 when it switched to the current full URL. As of April 2006, the English Wiktionary has more than 130,000 entries, although in early 2006 it was surpassed by the French Wiktionary, which now has more than 165,000 entries. More than a dozen languages now have Wiktionaries containing at least 10,000 entries.

Multilingualism

Unlike many dictionaries, which are monolingual or bilingual, Wiktionary is multilingual, meaning that the goal is to define every word from all known languages in every other language, as well as in the original language itself. For example, the English Wiktionary is written in English but accepts entries for words from all languages. The French Wiktionary can also have entries for all those same words, but the entries are written in French.

Comparison to other sister projects

One difference between Wiktionary and Misplaced Pages is that pages beginning with upper- and lowercase letters can refer to different things. For example, the entries on lowercase "i" and uppercase "I" are distinct. All of the existing entries in the English Wiktionary were converted to lowercase automatically in mid-2005; manual intervention is being used to move pages to uppercase as necessary.

Another difference is regarding verifiability. Some editors have interpreted Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion as meaning that a single reliable source is enough to prove a word's usage. Others, however, say that only three quotations will suffice, despite the fact that the page states that "Usage in a well-known work" qualifies as proof. These same editors claim that other dictionaries do not count. To many Misplaced Pages users accustomed to citing disputed assertions with a single source, having to give three sources is upsetting and unwelcoming. Many entries have been deleted because they have only had one or two sources.

Yet another difference is the lack of policies on Wiktionary. Many Misplaced Pages policies, such as the Three Revert Rule and No Personal Attacks are not policies on Wiktionary. To some users from Misplaced Pages, this makes the site seem like it is anarchic, and makes many administrator decisions seem arbitrary, as well.

WikiSaurus

WikiSaurus is a category in Wiktionary whose purpose is to serve as a thesaurus, including a thesaurus of slang words.

See "Creating a WikiSaurus entry" for the structure of wikiSaurus entries. An example of a well-formatted entry would be the "wiktionary: WikiSaurus: insane" page.

References

See also

Wikimedia Foundation
People
Projects
Current
Past
Projects
Other
Related

External links

Categories: