Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:47, 1 March 2012 editEkabhishek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators158,320 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:48, 1 March 2012 edit undoEkabhishek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators158,320 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
* '''Keep''' - This is a page of a drama serial of ] channel which is popular in ]. it is not a empty page or abusing something like and not promoting something and it has now verificable refrences... --] ] 14:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC) * '''Keep''' - This is a page of a drama serial of ] channel which is popular in ]. it is not a empty page or abusing something like and not promoting something and it has now verificable refrences... --] ] 14:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
:Except the references, being self-published, are not ]. ]] 05:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC) :Except the references, being self-published, are not ]. ]] 05:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' - Third party and reliable references added, notable enough to warrant an article. Just started and already mentioned in several news stories .--]<sup>]</sup> 12:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC) * '''Keep''' - Third party and reliable references added, notable enough to warrant an article. Just started and already mentioned in several news stories . Thanks! --]<sup>]</sup> 12:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:48, 1 March 2012

Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein

Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about a soap opera that provides no evidence of notability. The only mentions in reliable sources I can find are thin passing references such as . This article has already been deleted after a Prod (as not notable) and a speedy deletion (as recreated by a banned user). I don't believe this new TV show (launch Feb 14, 2012) is yet notable enough to support an article. Sparthorse (talk) 02:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Except the references, being self-published, are not reliable sources. Cloudz679 05:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories: