Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:08, 5 March 2012 editAnna Roy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,139 edits add viewing stats← Previous edit Revision as of 17:42, 5 March 2012 edit undoSgeureka (talk | contribs)Administrators34,684 edits Closing debate, result was keepNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. &ndash; ] <sup>]•]</sup> 17:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}


:{{la|Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) :{{la|Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>)
Line 9: Line 15:
<hr style="width:55%;" /> <hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" /> <hr style="width:55%;" />
*'''Delete'''. Deletion processes exist exactly for this kind of article. Fails various guidelines and policies as mentioned by nominator above. ]] 14:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Deletion processes exist exactly for this kind of article. Fails various guidelines and policies as mentioned by nominator above. ]] 14:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Line 17: Line 23:
* '''Keep''' - Third party and reliable references added, notable enough to warrant an article. Just started and already mentioned in several news stories . Thanks! --]<sup>]</sup> 12:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC) * '''Keep''' - Third party and reliable references added, notable enough to warrant an article. Just started and already mentioned in several news stories . Thanks! --]<sup>]</sup> 12:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Citations provided. It got 21 000 views in the last month so some people think it's notable in and of itself.<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] (])</font> 15:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. Citations provided. It got 21 000 views in the last month so some people think it's notable in and of itself.<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] (])</font> 15:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 17:42, 5 March 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – sgeureka 17:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein

Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about a soap opera that provides no evidence of notability. The only mentions in reliable sources I can find are thin passing references such as . This article has already been deleted after a Prod (as not notable) and a speedy deletion (as recreated by a banned user). I don't believe this new TV show (launch Feb 14, 2012) is yet notable enough to support an article. Sparthorse (talk) 02:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Except the references, being self-published, are not reliable sources. Cloudz679 05:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.