Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bueller 007: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:20, 12 April 2006 editFWBOarticle (talk | contribs)3,184 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 02:57, 13 April 2006 edit undoPatCheng (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,062 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


::sorry about being away so long. :) I'm involved in a big and "productive" edit and I was keeping myself away from edit war(s). For one, you can delete anything which doesn't have source. ] ::sorry about being away so long. :) I'm involved in a big and "productive" edit and I was keeping myself away from edit war(s). For one, you can delete anything which doesn't have source. ]

So anyone who supports China is a Chinese nationalist is it? Then you must be a Holocaust denier and stooge of the Jap government.--] 02:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:57, 13 April 2006

Nanking Massacre

I wish you luck. Unfortunately, this page is extremely controversial and has consistently been hijacked by POV warriors (Chinese nationalists) who are not interested in trying to present a balanced or considered analysis of the massacre; their purpose is to advertise the horror of the massacre and the culpability of the Japanese to the hilt. Their weapon is to dismiss anything that challenges or calls into question the hardline Chinese view as "revisionist". All Japanese sources are considered ipso facto suspect, which is a good indication of their mentality. I don't think your POV tag will go unchallenged.

Later note: I have now been accused of having a "blatant anti-chinese biase" and of making "inflammatory remarks" by an ethnic Chinese contributor living in Australia. As I said, I wish you luck. User:Bathrobe

Thanks for the note; I won't delete it. I agree that the problem exists on both sides. It's a sad state of affairs.

Bathrobe 11:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

sorry about being away so long. :) I'm involved in a big and "productive" edit and I was keeping myself away from edit war(s). For one, you can delete anything which doesn't have source. FWBOarticle

So anyone who supports China is a Chinese nationalist is it? Then you must be a Holocaust denier and stooge of the Jap government.--PatCheng 02:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)