Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:58, 13 April 2006 editMerecat (talk | contribs)2,799 edits →General user conduct: delete my comment - is mooted by other user intervention← Previous edit Revision as of 03:58, 13 April 2006 edit undoRenamedUser jaskldjslak904 (talk | contribs)24,239 editsm OppsNext edit →
Line 49: Line 49:
*] Many violations of ] He has received three formal warnings, several informal warnings but continues to attack. Edits include obscenity and vandalism. Revision by other editors of vandalism and POV posts are met with bad-faith accusations. *] Many violations of ] He has received three formal warnings, several informal warnings but continues to attack. Edits include obscenity and vandalism. Revision by other editors of vandalism and POV posts are met with bad-faith accusations.
*] Insistence on adding despite numerous efforts on talk page to work out solution; 3RR violations; deceptive edit summaries, impersonation, and sockpuppetry. <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 01:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC) *] Insistence on adding despite numerous efforts on talk page to work out solution; 3RR violations; deceptive edit summaries, impersonation, and sockpuppetry. <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 01:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
* <!-- delisting pending resolution of arbcomm matter ] - User has been
* ], POV-pushing, revert warring by United States congressional staffers, failure to work with the community, constant vandalism. ] (]) 08:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC) * ], POV-pushing, revert warring by United States congressional staffers, failure to work with the community, constant vandalism. ] (]) 08:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


Revision as of 03:58, 13 April 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Comments about individual users

This section is for discussing specific users who have violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in the Article content disputes section above.

Deleting uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Archives

Old discussions are kept in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive.

General user conduct


Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

  • Example user – {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold

  • Ixfd64 - reversing username blocks set by other administrators, with no prior discussion. 14:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Ta bu shi da yu (2) – out-of-process deletions of images that were tagged as "fair use" but believed not to be. 22:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • February userbox deletion – Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire.
  • Snowspinner (3rd RfC) - violations of blocking and deletion policies

List newer entries on top-->