Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:44, 13 April 2006 editCarnildo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,473 editsm Removing stray comment← Previous edit Revision as of 17:11, 13 April 2006 edit undoRspeer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,678 edits →General user conduct: rm Colignatus - his RfC is basically closed with him being blocked.Next edit →
Line 44: Line 44:
*] : This user has been unilaterally editing sensitive history related articles to conform to his POV. *] : This user has been unilaterally editing sensitive history related articles to conform to his POV.
*] &ndash; vandalism, trolling and personal attacks; reoffending after several blocks. ]&nbsp;<sub>(])</sub><sup>]</sup> ''20:09,&nbsp;14&nbsp;March&nbsp;2006'' *] &ndash; vandalism, trolling and personal attacks; reoffending after several blocks. ]&nbsp;<sub>(])</sub><sup>]</sup> ''20:09,&nbsp;14&nbsp;March&nbsp;2006''
*] -- ] is editing articles related to ]s to express his original research and his opinions, and retaliates against editors who revert or question his contributions with personal attacks, personal threats, and requests for payment for wasting his time. ] / ] 05:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
*] Chronic violator of the 3rr, engages in personal attacks (]), ignores consensus (]), possibly part of a Zionist movement, hijacks one or two pages by repeatedly reverting, using banners and excessive texts in the discussion page, incivil behavior (]), gaming the system (]), assuming bad faith(]), harassment (]), and engages in personal attacks (]). *] Chronic violator of the 3rr, engages in personal attacks (]), ignores consensus (]), possibly part of a Zionist movement, hijacks one or two pages by repeatedly reverting, using banners and excessive texts in the discussion page, incivil behavior (]), gaming the system (]), assuming bad faith(]), harassment (]), and engages in personal attacks (]).
*] &ndash; keeps changing the article on the ] to claim they were Turkic, even though we've worked hard to make this page show all sides of the issue; the exact ethnic identity of the Huns is disputed, and we want the page to reflect that. Nonetheless, Hakozen keeps changing all NPOV mentions of "uncertain" etc. to "Turkic" and no longer participates on the Talk page. After I contacted him on his user page, he claimed I and the other level-headed editors were anti-Turk racists serving Greek and Armenian masters. ] 01:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *] &ndash; keeps changing the article on the ] to claim they were Turkic, even though we've worked hard to make this page show all sides of the issue; the exact ethnic identity of the Huns is disputed, and we want the page to reflect that. Nonetheless, Hakozen keeps changing all NPOV mentions of "uncertain" etc. to "Turkic" and no longer participates on the Talk page. After I contacted him on his user page, he claimed I and the other level-headed editors were anti-Turk racists serving Greek and Armenian masters. ] 01:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:11, 13 April 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Comments about individual users

This section is for discussing specific users who have violated Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the NPOV policy, belong in the Article content disputes section above.

Deleting uncertified user RfCs

Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#User-conduct RfC for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

Archives

Old discussions are kept in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive.

General user conduct


Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Example user as a template, and then list it as follows:

  • Example user – {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold
List newer entries on top

Use of administrator privileges

This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Misplaced Pages:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

As with disputes over general user conduct, at least two people must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

Candidate pages - still need to meet the two person threshold

Approved pages - have met the two person threshold

  • Ixfd64 - reversing username blocks set by other administrators, with no prior discussion. 14:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Ta bu shi da yu (2) – out-of-process deletions of images that were tagged as "fair use" but believed not to be. 22:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • February userbox deletion – Both admins were involved in a mass speedy deletion of userboxes this past weekend, and it appears they have only added fuel to the fire.
  • Snowspinner (3rd RfC) - violations of blocking and deletion policies

List newer entries on top