| Revision as of 23:40, 18 March 2012 editTheSoundAndTheFury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,994 edits →Hi: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:50, 20 March 2012 edit undoBerndf (talk | contribs)87 edits →HiNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Hi Agada. I think sometimes that in editing or discussing things, if something does not go the way one wished or thought it should, it might be annoying. Especially, if you think something should be done one way, and others disagree, then it might also be annoying. I think it's not fair to then, because of one's personal frustration, respond by disadvantaging other users of the encyclopedia. By putting the tags you did on the page, you are effectively discounting a vast amount of work over a long period of time by many people to any potential reader, and I don't think that is fair to either the reader or to the people who worked on the content. I think that if you had engaged in much discussion and substantive issues could not be resolved, that would be a totally reasonable way to handle it: signal to the public that something ain't right. But I strongly disagree with using this method to get back at someone. Please consider the time of other people that you are using when you do these things. I don't think it's very fair. Anyway, please be aware that there are dispute resolution remedies if you continue to disrupt the page. Thanks. And sorry about this. ] (]) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | Hi Agada. I think sometimes that in editing or discussing things, if something does not go the way one wished or thought it should, it might be annoying. Especially, if you think something should be done one way, and others disagree, then it might also be annoying. I think it's not fair to then, because of one's personal frustration, respond by disadvantaging other users of the encyclopedia. By putting the tags you did on the page, you are effectively discounting a vast amount of work over a long period of time by many people to any potential reader, and I don't think that is fair to either the reader or to the people who worked on the content. I think that if you had engaged in much discussion and substantive issues could not be resolved, that would be a totally reasonable way to handle it: signal to the public that something ain't right. But I strongly disagree with using this method to get back at someone. Please consider the time of other people that you are using when you do these things. I don't think it's very fair. Anyway, please be aware that there are dispute resolution remedies if you continue to disrupt the page. Thanks. And sorry about this. ] (]) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Sigma == | |||
| Hello, I wanted to alert you to my removal of a change you made to the history section of ]. See ] page for explanation. | |||
Revision as of 18:50, 20 March 2012
- Misplaced Pages Loves Art
-
Mixtec-Puebla Style Pipe with Bluebird, A.D. 1100-1400
-
Censer Stand Depicting Principal Bird Deity, 250-450 A.D.
-
Olmec Bloodletter Handle, 1000-600BC
.jpg)
|
Hi
Hi Agada. I think sometimes that in editing or discussing things, if something does not go the way one wished or thought it should, it might be annoying. Especially, if you think something should be done one way, and others disagree, then it might also be annoying. I think it's not fair to then, because of one's personal frustration, respond by disadvantaging other users of the encyclopedia. By putting the tags you did on the page, you are effectively discounting a vast amount of work over a long period of time by many people to any potential reader, and I don't think that is fair to either the reader or to the people who worked on the content. I think that if you had engaged in much discussion and substantive issues could not be resolved, that would be a totally reasonable way to handle it: signal to the public that something ain't right. But I strongly disagree with using this method to get back at someone. Please consider the time of other people that you are using when you do these things. I don't think it's very fair. Anyway, please be aware that there are dispute resolution remedies if you continue to disrupt the page. Thanks. And sorry about this. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Sigma
Hello, I wanted to alert you to my removal of a change you made to the history section of Sigma. See Talk page for explanation.