| Revision as of 11:56, 25 July 2004 editDocu (talk | contribs)97,802 editsm re: Talk:Falkland Islands← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:01, 25 July 2004 edit undoWikibob (talk | contribs)2,524 edits I agreeNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :There might not have been a ]-page. I suppose we could just move it back. -- User:Docu | :There might not have been a ]-page. I suppose we could just move it back. -- User:Docu | ||
| I think you're right, google just shows a cache of the edit window, unless it did its dance very recently. I think I see what happened, Cantu used the name from the CIA country list, maybe automatically with a script. Problem is, the gives its full name as "Falkland Islands" , as does the . The islands are not a member of the United Nations, who list them as the CIA does, but disclaims any claim to accuracy. There is no ambiguity with the original name, so I see no need for this name change, and it should be moved back. -] | ] 22:01, 2004 Jul 25 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:01, 25 July 2004
Where has the Talk:Falkland Islands page gone? And why was this page moved? Was their a discussion and consensus? If so I missed it. -Wikibob | Talk 11:44, 2004 Jul 25 (UTC)
- There might not have been a Talk:Falkland Islands-page. I suppose we could just move it back. -- User:Docu
I think you're right, google just shows a cache of the edit window, unless it did its dance very recently. I think I see what happened, Cantu used the name from the CIA country list, maybe automatically with a script. Problem is, the UK Foreign Office gives its full name as "Falkland Islands" , as does the Falkland Islands Government. The islands are not a member of the United Nations, who list them as the CIA does, but disclaims any claim to accuracy. There is no ambiguity with the original name, so I see no need for this name change, and it should be moved back. -Wikibob | Talk 22:01, 2004 Jul 25 (UTC)