| Revision as of 16:56, 15 April 2006 editJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 edits No personal attacks← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:23, 17 April 2006 edit undoMomento (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,864 edits →No personal attacksNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| : ] Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy: '''There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them.''' Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. <!-- --> ] <small>] • ]</small> 16:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | : ] Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy: '''There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them.''' Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. <!-- --> ] <small>] • ]</small> 16:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Clarification== | |||
| You asked Jossi - Is it true though that you are paid to work here on the article?PatW 11:12, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Jossi replied - Of course not. That is an attempt by detractors to undermine my work in this project. Well, that is not a happening thing. I love this project and I am proud of the work I am doing here and my contributions to this and other projects. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 17:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Well, You responded - That's nice of you to clarify it for me. Should I take it that your comment "Well, that is not a happening thing" means that you were employed by them on this but are no longer? | |||
| Comment- Jossi's answered your question "Is it true though that you are paid to work here on the article" in his first sentence "Of course not". | |||
| His second sentence explained why the rumour had started. His third sentence expanded on the second. And his forth sentence expanded on the third. | |||
| Stylistically and grammatically the third sentence is not related to the first. I hope this goes someone to clear up your confusion over this.] 00:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:23, 17 April 2006
Welcome to Misplaced Pages
Welcome, PatW!
Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Misplaced Pages experience:
- First, take a look at the Misplaced Pages Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
- When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
- If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
- Misplaced Pages has a vibrant community of editors. The village pump is a great place to see the goings on.
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Also, here are some pointers to learn more about this project:
- Misplaced Pages:Five pillars
- Misplaced Pages:Policy trifecta
- Misplaced Pages:Brilliant prose
- Misplaced Pages:Be bold in updating pages
- Misplaced Pages:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.
You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.
Best of luck, and have fun editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 02:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for yoru contributions. As a mater of etiquette, it would be nice if you write a summary of your edit in the Edit summary box. Thank you for your consideration. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 19:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Your user page
Thank you for the candor expressed in your user page. You may want to read Misplaced Pages:User page, to learn what is appropriate and what is not appropriate to have in your user page. Another pointer you may want to consult is What Misplaced Pages is not. I would go as far as suggesting that calling felow editors like me, that spend considerable time in this project (and not only on articles related to Prem Rawat) "over-zealous" that "subtley promote their simplistic demonisation of critics" is not in harmony with your statement about "truth and reconciliation". For your information, I have several friends that are no longer students of Prem Rawat, and they do not consider themselves part of this small group of vocal critics that call themselves "ex-premies". Polarization starts when the "ex-premie" group calls me and fellow students "brainwashed cult members" or worse, or when they call the venues were we want to peacefully gather to listen to our teacher with the intention to deny us from doing so. For what I have seen from you so far, and from the statements in your user page, I appreciate your distancing from that group and their tactics, and hope you can assist in making these and other related articles, better, more neutral and more encyclopedic. Happy editing. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 15:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
No personal attacks
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 16:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Clarification
You asked Jossi - Is it true though that you are paid to work here on the article?PatW 11:12, 16 April 2006 (UTC) Jossi replied - Of course not. That is an attempt by detractors to undermine my work in this project. Well, that is not a happening thing. I love this project and I am proud of the work I am doing here and my contributions to this and other projects. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 17:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Well, You responded - That's nice of you to clarify it for me. Should I take it that your comment "Well, that is not a happening thing" means that you were employed by them on this but are no longer?
Comment- Jossi's answered your question "Is it true though that you are paid to work here on the article" in his first sentence "Of course not". His second sentence explained why the rumour had started. His third sentence expanded on the second. And his forth sentence expanded on the third. Stylistically and grammatically the third sentence is not related to the first. I hope this goes someone to clear up your confusion over this.Momento 00:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)