Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Review/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Race and intelligence | Review Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:07, 9 April 2012 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits Copyvios← Previous edit Revision as of 19:09, 9 April 2012 edit undoMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits CopyviosNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


:Incidentally, this is ''exactly'' the kind of behavior from you that makes me want an interaction ban. I do not need you to police me and follow me around like this, on-Wiki or off. I am quite capable of working out honest copyright mistakes on my own. -] (]) 18:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC) :Incidentally, this is ''exactly'' the kind of behavior from you that makes me want an interaction ban. I do not need you to police me and follow me around like this, on-Wiki or off. I am quite capable of working out honest copyright mistakes on my own. -] (]) 18:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
::No, they were deleted vey quickly without any help from me. DeviantArt is a site for kids. It has no academic validity whatsoever. You added an image of a dinosaur with blood oozing from its jaws. Why did you do that? Just for LULZ? ] (]) 19:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC) ::No, they were deleted vey quickly without any help from me. Where were your OTRS tickets? In the absence of those, you were just lying. DeviantArt is a site for kids. It has no academic validity whatsoever. You added an image of a dinosaur with blood oozing from its jaws. Why did you do that? Just for LULZ? ] (]) 19:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


==Le beurre et l'argent du beurre (Hypocrisy)== ==Le beurre et l'argent du beurre (Hypocrisy)==

Revision as of 19:09, 9 April 2012

Main review page (Talk)Evidence (Talk)Proposed decision (Talk)Original case page

Review clerk: ] (])Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes


Copyvios

Ferhago the Assassin in her recent edits today added 4 illegal images on Commons, claiming dishonestly that the images had been licensed under a Creative Commons license, and then linked them to wikipedia articles. All of these were blatant copivios, I contacted User:Alison earlier today to indicate that there was a problem and then later tagged two of them on commons. All four of them have now been been deleted. All of these linked to DeviantArt. I have no understanding of why Ferahgo the Assassin thought she could upload those images: her actions are inexplicable. She has on previous occasions asserted that nothing on that site concerning her can be examined. Now, however, with these edits she has stepped over a line and placed herself in a sitiation where normally it would be hard to defend her actions or prevent wikipedians from looking at her own participation on DeviantArt. Mathsci (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Comment My own understanding is that Ferahgo the Assassin has been less than open in what she has written on wikipedia. I also understand that arbitrators, including Roger Davies, have been aware of that for some period of time (probably more than a year). Mathsci (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Oh, YOU tagged these images at Commons? I explained the issue fully here. The artists of all four images gave me explicit permission to upload the images at commons. They told me they'd uploaded them at DA under the correct licenses to use at commons, but they apparently failed to understand the difference between CC licenses and just selected DA's default option for CC license. I have been contacting the artists explaining the situation, and they are replacing the license so I can re-upload them correctly. I have already done so with one of them and he has replaced the image himself, after changing the license.
Incidentally, this is exactly the kind of behavior from you that makes me want an interaction ban. I do not need you to police me and follow me around like this, on-Wiki or off. I am quite capable of working out honest copyright mistakes on my own. -Ferahgo the Assassin (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
No, they were deleted vey quickly without any help from me. Where were your OTRS tickets? In the absence of those, you were just lying. DeviantArt is a site for kids. It has no academic validity whatsoever. You added an image of a dinosaur with blood oozing from its jaws. Why did you do that? Just for LULZ? Mathsci (talk) 19:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Le beurre et l'argent du beurre (Hypocrisy)

Placeholder. Mathsci (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Update header request

Per please update the header to say Estimates instead of DeadlinesNobody Ent 18:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)