Misplaced Pages

User talk:LisaSastro: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:57, 17 April 2006 editPrimetime (talk | contribs)3,581 edits Article listed for deletion: Thx← Previous edit Revision as of 02:49, 26 September 2006 edit undoKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits please helpNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:


:Thanks, Lisa.--] 02:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC) :Thanks, Lisa.--] 02:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

== Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now ==
Sorry to bother you, but as an ] things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion ]. ] 02:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:49, 26 September 2006

A welcome from Sango123

Hello, LisaSastro, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Misplaced Pages is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

Sango123 (e) 23:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Article listed for deletion

Hi Lisa,

I noticed from the Inclusionist category page that you're an inclusionist, too, so I was wondering if you would be able to do me a huge favor and possibly place a vote here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Embarazada. I added a ton to it, citing my sources. If you could, I would be greatly in your debt.

Best wishes,

Primetime 21:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Lisa.--Primetime 02:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now

Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Category: