Revision as of 20:48, 18 April 2012 editWisdomtenacityfocus (talk | contribs)6,471 edits ←Replaced content with '{{unblock|My edits were completely in reason in regard to sources and guidelines.}}'← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:02, 18 April 2012 edit undoBoing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users96,327 edits DeclineNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock|My edits were completely in reason in regard to sources and guidelines.}} | {{unblock reviewed | 1=My edits were completely in reason in regard to sources and guidelines. | decline=Request does not address the reasons for the block, as decided ] -- ] (]) 21:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 21:02, 18 April 2012
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Wisdomtenacityfocus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My edits were completely in reason in regard to sources and guidelines.
Decline reason:
Request does not address the reasons for the block, as decided at AN3 -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.