Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wisdomtenacityfocus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:02, 18 April 2012 editBoing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users96,327 edits Decline← Previous edit Revision as of 21:40, 18 April 2012 edit undoJ Greb (talk | contribs)89,090 edits And FWIW: Deleteing the block notification *before* the block ends is not proper. Feel free after the Block expires though.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Result of your 3RR complaint ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --> The complete report of this case is at ]. ] (]) 04:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=My edits were completely in reason in regard to sources and guidelines. | decline=Request does not address the reasons for the block, as decided ] -- ] (]) 21:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed | 1=My edits were completely in reason in regard to sources and guidelines. | decline=Request does not address the reasons for the block, as decided ] -- ] (]) 21:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 21:40, 18 April 2012

Result of your 3RR complaint

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Friginator reported by User:Wisdomtenacityfocus (Result: Both blocked). EdJohnston (talk) 04:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wisdomtenacityfocus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My edits were completely in reason in regard to sources and guidelines.

Decline reason:

Request does not address the reasons for the block, as decided at AN3 -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.