| Revision as of 05:03, 19 April 2012 editGarnetAndBlack (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,019 edits 2nd vandalism warning, 1st 3RR warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:20, 19 April 2012 edit undo98.94.204.96 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==April 2012== | ==April 2012== | ||
| ] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of ], such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> | ] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of ], such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> | ||
| *Umm, Thanks. Apparently upon reading over the history and talk, you have not been following guidelines, protocol, nor the page consensus regarding this article section, and have been using redundant citations and sockpuppetry on this page ],]. The citations are still used in the re-edit, which according to the consensus, is only supposed to mention the "recruiting violations." It's on the talk page. The details are listed in the actual article citations, which is one reason they are there. ] (]) 05:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}This is your second warning for repeated vandalism at this article. If you have issues with sourced and verifiable content, take it to the article's Talk page and seek consensus for your proposed changes. Further violations of Misplaced Pages policy will be reported and you will be subject to being blocked.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
Revision as of 05:20, 19 April 2012
April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Clemson Tigers football, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
- Umm, Thanks. Apparently upon reading over the history and talk, you have not been following guidelines, protocol, nor the page consensus regarding this article section, and have been using redundant citations and sockpuppetry on this page WP:SOC,WP:3RRNO. The citations are still used in the re-edit, which according to the consensus, is only supposed to mention the "recruiting violations." It's on the talk page. The details are listed in the actual article citations, which is one reason they are there. 98.94.204.96 (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)