Revision as of 22:32, 5 May 2012 editIloveandrea (talk | contribs)4,026 edits →Removing the quotes← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:25, 6 May 2012 edit undoKahastok (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,810 edits →Removing the quotes: rNext edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::You don't understand the source of the bias: it is ]. All your comment serves to do its reveal that you are a Tory voter. I find it irritating that who make zero effort to add to the article and track developments sit in judgment over me. Look at the edit history, I've made virtually ''every single one of them''. That shows you how much other users actually care about this topic. Cut me some slack, I can tone it down if you give me a chance. ~ ] (]) 22:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC) | ::You don't understand the source of the bias: it is ]. All your comment serves to do its reveal that you are a Tory voter. I find it irritating that who make zero effort to add to the article and track developments sit in judgment over me. Look at the edit history, I've made virtually ''every single one of them''. That shows you how much other users actually care about this topic. Cut me some slack, I can tone it down if you give me a chance. ~ ] (]) 22:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::You do not have to be a Tory voter to want Misplaced Pages to meet its ]. It doesn't matter what the source of the bias is (though I'm glad that you acknowledge that the article is biased): it shouldn't be there at all. '']'' <small>'']''</small> 08:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:25, 6 May 2012
Politics of the United Kingdom Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Removing the quotes
Unless I recive some solid objections I'm going to remove the quotes since at the moment they seem pretty slanted.Genisock2 (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose you haven't read the prose? I wouldn't blame you, it's a bit dense. Suffice it to say that this article ranks roughly alongside Labour party election campaign literature in terms of editorial bias. Kahastok talk 19:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- You don't understand the source of the bias: it is Keynesian. All your comment serves to do its reveal that you are a Tory voter. I find it irritating that who make zero effort to add to the article and track developments sit in judgment over me. Look at the edit history, I've made virtually every single one of them. That shows you how much other users actually care about this topic. Cut me some slack, I can tone it down if you give me a chance. ~ Iloveandrea (talk) 22:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- You do not have to be a Tory voter to want Misplaced Pages to meet its core policy standards. It doesn't matter what the source of the bias is (though I'm glad that you acknowledge that the article is biased): it shouldn't be there at all. Kahastok talk 08:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)