| Revision as of 10:51, 21 April 2006 editCurps (talk | contribs)52,628 editsm Reverted edits by Cametoriv (talk) to last version by JzG← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:01, 21 April 2006 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,078 edits →[]: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Relisting, then, for a (hopefully) clean debate. ] 09:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | Relisting, then, for a (hopefully) clean debate. ] 09:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Which turns out to be a forlorn hope, since this debate has already been removed from the article and/or blanked by one user and two sockpuppets. ] 11:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:01, 21 April 2006
Simon Strelchik
Previously kept no consensus, but discussion on AN/I indicates substantial sockpuppetry in the VaughanWatch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) mould. The subject is a failed political candidate whose only real claim to notability appears to be as a "founder member" of Free the Children, but this membership was not significant enought to be mentioned in the article for the group itself and there is no indication of how many such there are (and indeed no apparent citation for the claim). For the record I wanted to nominate this myself anyway but was put off by the recent second nom; had I realised at the time that it was a sockfest I'd have done so.
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik (second nomination)
Relisting, then, for a (hopefully) clean debate. Just zis Guy you know? 09:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Which turns out to be a forlorn hope, since this debate has already been removed from the article and/or blanked by one user and two sockpuppets. Just zis Guy you know? 11:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)