Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:08, 27 May 2012 view sourceKeilana (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators59,299 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci/Archive← Previous edit Revision as of 10:59, 16 June 2012 view source Water marble nail (talk | contribs)19 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{pp-semi|small=yes}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{pp-semi|small=yes}}</noinclude>
{{SPIarchive notice|Mathsci}} {{SPIarchive notice|Mathsci}}

{{SPI case status|CUrequest}}

=====<big>16 June 2012</big>=====

;Suspected sockpuppets

* {{checkuser|1=Peter E. James}}


<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>

Clear sock- or meat-puppetry at ]. The discussion turns on an email sent to Mathsci two years ago, which he then commented on at ] in April 2010. PEJ turns up at the SPI with a detailed textual analysis of this private email to support Mathsci's position (that he had been mistaken in what he wrote then about that email). Quite clearly no-one but Mathsci himself, or a close friend contacted off-wiki could know that, and it's a pretty clear case of trying to stack the discussion by promoting a false appearance of agreement for Mathsci's position. Checkuser suggested to determine whether this is Mathsci himself or just a friend. ] (]) 10:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 10:59, 16 June 2012

Mathsci

Mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci/Archive.

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

16 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Clear sock- or meat-puppetry at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Matilda. The discussion turns on an email sent to Mathsci two years ago, which he then commented on at User talk:Rhomb in April 2010. PEJ turns up at the SPI with a detailed textual analysis of this private email to support Mathsci's position (that he had been mistaken in what he wrote then about that email). Quite clearly no-one but Mathsci himself, or a close friend contacted off-wiki could know that, and it's a pretty clear case of trying to stack the discussion by promoting a false appearance of agreement for Mathsci's position. Checkuser suggested to determine whether this is Mathsci himself or just a friend. Water marble nail (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: