Revision as of 02:58, 2 June 2012 view sourceAmaury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers98,253 editsm →Excuse me: Reply.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:58, 2 June 2012 view source Amaury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers98,253 editsm →Excuse me =Next edit → | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
== June 2012 == | == June 2012 == | ||
== Excuse me === | === Excuse me === | ||
In you labeled my removal of inappropriate material as vandalism. However, let it be known that the material you re-added is unencyclopedic (for example, the quotes section) and unstylistic (for example, the external link in the prose that directed a user to an unverified document of largely irrelevant information). Please be more careful next time. ] (]) 02:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC) | In you labeled my removal of inappropriate material as vandalism. However, let it be known that the material you re-added is unencyclopedic (for example, the quotes section) and unstylistic (for example, the external link in the prose that directed a user to an unverified document of largely irrelevant information). Please be more careful next time. ] (]) 02:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:58, 2 June 2012
It is approximately 3:32 AM where this user lives. |
I screwed up, just to say hello, or anything else! I won't bite! I have a few requests that I hope you'll respect while posting here:
|
Archives |
---|
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
June 2012
Excuse me
In this edit you labeled my removal of inappropriate material as vandalism. However, let it be known that the material you re-added is unencyclopedic (for example, the quotes section) and unstylistic (for example, the external link in the prose that directed a user to an unverified document of largely irrelevant information). Please be more careful next time. 99.144.114.54 (talk) 02:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- My apologies. That should have been a neutral revert with a removal of content warning, not a vandalism warning. In the future, though, I would use edit summaries to make it clear what you are doing so someone coming along doesn't mistake it as nonconstructive. Cheers! - Zhou Yu (talk) 02:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)