Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:08, 9 June 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from X-ray computed tomography. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. Thanks and welcome to Misplaced Pages.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't see where in WP:MEDRS it say that one can't use primary sources. Which source do you think is not a quality source? Would you mind talking at the article talk page before you just delete everything on your own opinion?79.179.224.214 (talk) 16:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Also would be nice if you would add to notify people to search refs, instead of just deleting whatever you don't like.

see http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:MEDRS bottom of the page for how to do that. 79.179.224.214 (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

There is also a symbol for 79.179.224.214 (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

We do not use primary sources typically and money of the sources you are using do not even mention CT scans. Thus I will remove this text again until these issues are dealt with.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

You will be blocked if you continue to edit war poor quality content into this article. The refs you are using do not support the content in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

In my view, you delete without providing sufficient explanations. Without marking facts requiring refs, and without providing sufficient time for other editors to respond to the (not given) marks. Do you think that your opinion mater more than others, and that you need not explain it to any one because you are always correct? Do you think that it is not possible that any one would know better than you? About your threat to ban, please provide me with more information with regard to such process, so that I would be able to contemplate which one of us would be banned, in case that such a process would occur. Regard.