| Revision as of 20:18, 13 June 2012 view sourceFriginator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers14,892 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 123.65.222.232 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Hello71. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:56, 2 November 2012 view source 193.142.113.141 (talk) TopicNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I must say, as substantially as I enjoyed reading what you had to say, I couldnt help but lose interest after a while. Its as if you had a terrific grasp around the topic matter, but you forgot to include your readers. Perhaps you should think about this from a lot more than one angle. Or maybe you shouldnt generalise so much. Its better if you think about what others may have to say instead of just heading for a gut reaction to the subject. Think about adjusting your personal thought process and giving others who may read this the benefit of the doubt. | |||
| #REDIRECT ] {{R from other disambiguation}} | |||
Revision as of 12:56, 2 November 2012
I must say, as substantially as I enjoyed reading what you had to say, I couldnt help but lose interest after a while. Its as if you had a terrific grasp around the topic matter, but you forgot to include your readers. Perhaps you should think about this from a lot more than one angle. Or maybe you shouldnt generalise so much. Its better if you think about what others may have to say instead of just heading for a gut reaction to the subject. Think about adjusting your personal thought process and giving others who may read this the benefit of the doubt.