| Revision as of 21:50, 14 June 2012 editJoefromrandb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,279 edits Undid revision 497616464 by Teapeat (talk)I left a thorough, well-explained edit summary, and you undo it without a word of explanation? such nerve!← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:58, 14 June 2012 edit undoTeapeat (talk | contribs)2,877 edits rv: wikipedia doesn't have articles on adjectives, (e.g. fastest, slowest, heaviest, pound for pound etc. etc.), they're inherently unencyclopedic; it would have to be pound for pound best boxer or somethingNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Wiktionary redirect|pound-for-pound}}{{Short pages monitor}}<!-- This long comment was added to the page to prevent it from being listed on Special:Shortpages. It and the accompanying monitoring template were generated via Template:Long comment. Please do not remove the monitor template without removing the comment as well.--> | |||
| '''Pound for pound''' is a term to describe how any two things compare when bearing in mind their varying quantities; for example, a tin of tomatoes weighing 250 g and costing $2.50 is more expensive, pound for pound, than one weighing 500 g and costing $4 (as the former costs $1.00 per 100 g and the latter $0.80 per 100 g). | |||
| ==In sport== | |||
| It is used in ]s such as ]<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4184227.stm |title=BBC pound-for-pound British rankings |publisher=] |date=8 June 2011 |accessdate=17 June 2011 }}</ref> or ]<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.fightersonlymagazine.co.uk/features/viewarticle.php?id=4258 |first=Matt |last=Hyde |title=The pound for pound debate |work=Fighters Only Magazine |date=8 April 2010 |accessdate=2010-06-29 }}</ref> to describe a fighter's value in relation to fighters of different ]es. As these fighters do not compete directly judging the best fighter pound for pound is subjective and ratings vary. They may be based on a range of criteria including "quality of opposition", factors such as how exciting the fighter is or how famous they are, or be an attempt to determine who would win if all the those ranked were the same size. In boxing, '']'' magazine maintains a ] of fighters. ] has a list for mixed martial artists.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://espn.go.com/mma/rankings |title=MMA Power Rankings |author= ESPN.com staff |date=2 June 2011 |publisher=] |accessdate=17 June 2011}}</ref> For example; "Pound for pound, Jesse Albright can beat up Ben Haney". ] is an example of a pound-for-pound top fighter. | |||
| ==References== | |||
| {{Reflist}} | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Term-stub}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 21:58, 14 June 2012
Soft redirect to Wiktionary| Misplaced Pages does not have an article on "pound for pound", but its sister project Wiktionary does:
Read the Wiktionary entry "pound-for-pound" You can also:
|  |