Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:54, 27 June 2012

Archive

Scorpion

Scoprion might be a boss character from the game MK Shaolin Monks but that doesn't match the other games. Otherwise, Scorpion would be a boss character like Shao Kahn, Goro, Kintaro and Shang Tsung, so isn't it a bit of a nonsense to mention that he's a boss character in the main article? You could add that he was a main character in MK Shaolin Monks. M0RG@N (talk) 18:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Just a friendly note

Since I found you're still reverting vandals by undoing them manually, I think getting rollback might make it easier and faster. You seem to have the required experience. :) CyanGardevoir 06:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

try not to edit when someone else is working on an article

It messes up the page order and it also smacks of tinkering. If you can't see what needs to be done. Don't start when someone who does, is already working. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.178.66 (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

This ain't about edit warring, it's about making an article tight, formatted and understandable. After going back through the article history I see all that you have been doing is dabbling. The references were not formatted and none of the poor grammar of text was substantially altered to be more concise, logical and less dependent on tautology. I noticed you reverted and left in unformatted half refs: name, book, page (where's the publisher, the year, ISBN?). Misplaced Pages has rules on references and their formatting. All I want to do is help create better articles that are actually correct and informative for anyone who is interested in reading them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.180.88 (talk) 08:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Revert a good faith edit only after careful consideration

Hi, Niemti. Reverting the whole edit discourages other editors. If your reversion is not adequately supported as in this case then the reverted editor may find it difficult to assume good faith on your part. I noticed, you prefer to use Misplaced Pages's 'undo' feature rather than to modify any part of an edit which is problematic, as you did here. There's a number of guidelines devoted to this sort of thing including WP:RVV, WP:ROWN, WP:EMBARGO, etc. You're a prolific contributor with 12,302 edits since 2012-03-16, but remember, a reversion is a complete rejection of the work of another editor. In some cases a rollback (without any apparent explanation) is like a slap in the face, so please don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Poeticbent talk 23:52, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Oskar D.: Warsaw was for Dirlewanger not really different than his Belarusian countryside adventures (the only difference being a whole big city for him to rape), and what's maybe more important, Slovakia-Hungary-Germany was not Warsaw anyway (Dirlewanger's crimes in Slovakia are little known, like the Slovak uprising is in general). "Inception into NSDAP" is also strangely worded, and for most people Inception is a film. I used "World War I and the interwar period" instead. --Niemti (talk) 07:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• I appreciate your help. Focha is not in Wola, correct. On the other hand, none of us is in Dirlewanger's head. None of us can say, what was... and was not really different for him in his own head. I suggest, we concentrate on collaborative writing, not on lecturing each other, i.e. Inception (disambiguation). Poeticbent talk 15:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• • What I meant is that placing such a strong emphasis on his rampage in Warsaw in particular is belittling his reign of terror in Belarus 1942-44, and Misplaced Pages is an English/international Misplaced Pages. --Niemti (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• I understand. But we have to follow what we can prove about his antics. The more sources we find online, the better. Poeticbent talk 15:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

I noticed that you again reverted a good-faith edit wholesale here. I agree it wasn't the best edit, but it was constructive and made in good faith. In cases like that it's better to improve their edit rather than reverting it completely. Gigs (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

"Good faith" gibberish, and I don't even know if any of this was true because it was unsourced. --Niemti (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Category Dispute

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. The reverted edit can be found here and here. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox--GoShow (...............) 14:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

That's a very constructive edit, fictional demons are not immortal by default and films are not characters. --Niemti (talk) 15:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Please, look further to Immortality in fiction if need to further discussion, changes were made by administrators to add addition from the main default, such as angels, vampires, and demons, please do not disrupt any system as you have a period of warring with other users.--GoShow (...............) 15:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

There's no need to "discuss" anything in such a clear case. I'll just give you one example: the Cyberdemon. It was very mortal. I was shooting at it until it died. --Niemti (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Mad Max 4

You have deleted information from the mad max page about a film that is actually IN PRODUCTION: http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/movies/charlize-theron-shaves-it-all-off-for-mad-max-4/story-e6frfmvr-1226393995976

Therefore I'm restoring the proper information to the article.

Your references supporting an "animated film" are GROSSLY outdated. The fourth Mad Max is releasing next year and the fifth film will soon follow.

Colliric (talk) 15:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

These are not "my references". All I did is cleanup (oh, and don't duplicate the material). --Niemti (talk) 15:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Category:Fictional angels, List of Jewel Riders episodes, and Category:Fictional demons, you may be blocked from editing. Ealdgyth - Talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.124.141.231 (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)