| Revision as of 19:03, 9 July 2012 editHublolly (talk | contribs)180 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:27, 9 July 2012 edit undoPatrick0Moran (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,602 edits ADMINISTRATORS: vendetta in progress. Undid revision 501440678 by Hublolly (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| {{-}} | {{-}} | ||
| Awesome! ] (]) 19:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Revision as of 20:27, 9 July 2012
- THIS USER HAS LEFT WIKIPEDIA. I WILL NO LONGER CONTRIBUTE OR RESPOND TO MESSAGES.
- The reason is obvious and simple - every single edit of mine has been reverted because they are failures. There is just no point in me editing - as I always have and always will inevitably create work for other knowledgeable and good-faith editors clearing up my mistakes, and explaining on the talk page. This will NOT improve wikipedia - will it? I only reduce its quality. If WP is still around, maybe I'll come back in a few years when I know far more maths and physics and can contribute correctly, but definitley not for now...
 | Content contributed by this user is released into the public domain. |
Background
Lets see... I never have much to say which is why it took so long for this article to be created...
On 25/05/2012 - I effectivley finished the 2nd year of a theoretical physics and applied maths degree programme ("sophomore" - they say in the USA), and about to proceed to the 3rd year. The only tranquillity I have is in the thought of physics and mathematics, and in particular: equations. In all other activities, I think/feel of nothing: zero emotion, just do the task so that soon I can return my head to the thought of physics + maths. I am not normal: though perhaps pseudo-autistic (I possess all characteristics, except for any intelligence).
(Negative) contributions
Lets see.... Generally - I'm fascinated in physics and maths, in all modern, sophisticated, intricate fields of it. So I try to edit some articles, and they become completely and chaotically fuddled and wrong. Then I get angry (for no reason) because those who provide feedback are experts/knowlegable people who are correct: because they are generally experts in the field.
No-one will believe this, and it doesn't matter: I actually want to make the articles better, clearer, and more understandable, and detest gain of credit. For me - credit is just an empty term, it doesn't apply to me - only others, because pretty much everyone except me deserves it, specifically those on Misplaced Pages. Fortunately - I will NEVER gain awards ("barnstars"), nor any praise, and this is all splendid and deserved. Clarifying articles used to be my main priority on Misplaced Pages, then I restricted myself only to images, and crossing my fingers hoping they're clear enough. They never were...
External pages
- Article contributions
- Image creations
- My own sandbox: User: Maschen/sandbox.