Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:41, 10 July 2012

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Roux

Roux (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Please note that a case was originally opened under Hublolly (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Roux. Future cases should be placed under Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Roux.

10 July 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

• Hublolly (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 69.158.87.247 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Roux's edit to my talkpage: A moment of clarity for you.

You are not permitted to post to my talkpage under any circumstances. The history of your attitude towards me is far too long for anyone with more than one braincell to believe you are unbiased. Is that clear? Do not, ever, post to my talkpage again. If I have done something so egregious that I need talking to, someone else will do it. Not you. Ever. As an editor or as an admin, you are permanently unwelcome at my talkpage. I will not be watching your page, and should you ever post to my talkpage again it will be construed as harassment and I will take it to ArbCom if necessary. I trust we understand each other. Goodbye. → ROUX ₪ 23:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Hublolly's edit to Jprg1966's talkpage: A moment of clarity for you

You are not permitted to post to my talkpage under any circumstances - given your paranoia and obsession with getting me into trouble. Is that clear? Do not, ever, at all, in any shape, form, geometry, infiltration procedure, post to my talkpage again. If I have done something so egregious that I need talking to, someone else will do it. Not you. Ever. As an editor or as an admin, you are permanently unwelcome at my talkpage. I will not be watching your page, and should you ever post to my talkpage again it will be construed as harassment and I will take it to ArbCom if necessary. Never. Ever. Forever. To eternity and beyond - when our atoms become the reminants of the destroyed solar system, to drift through the universe and from which anything can happen - be it that they form a new planetary nebula and solar systems with new life forms which devlop their own computer technologies and internets and wikipedias telling the same thing to simalar editors, or crushed and shredded by black-holes, whooshed through wormholes (should such cosmological topology exist in spacetime fabric), and collapsed into the big crunch or frozen solid in the "deep freeze" end to the universe. Except that you will not edit my talk page. Not ever. For all time. Understood? Sparkling clear as a wine glass? Actually - is diamond opaque in comparison to what I just said? I trust we understand each other. Goodbye. :-/ Hublolly (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Roux is currently under a two-week block, so if they match, this is block evasion. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

I just added the IP above, as it claimed to be Roux posting to WP:BN and User talk:Roux. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Hublolly (talk · contribs) is  Technically indistinguishable from User:F=q(E+v^B). WilliamH (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

And to elaborate, a technical connection between Hublolly and Roux is  Not possible. No comment on the IP address listed. WilliamH (talk) 20:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

• Open SPI cases
• SPI cases awaiting administration
• SPI cases CU complete