Revision as of 17:05, 18 July 2012 editDieSwartzPunkt (talk | contribs)3,096 edits →Blatant violation of the rules.: CM← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:06, 18 July 2012 edit undoDieSwartzPunkt (talk | contribs)3,096 edits →Blatant violation of the rules.: eNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You have taken to deleting other editor's comments from article talk pages. This is a flagrant violation of ] and can lead to you being blocked on its own. I have also monitored the usual sarcastic edit summaries from you. It is clear that you have failed to heed the warning left on your talk page by an administrator. I have thus initiated the procedure to re-open the RfC against you and to request administator intervention. ] (]) 15:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | You have taken to deleting other editor's comments from article talk pages. This is a flagrant violation of ] and can lead to you being blocked on its own. I have also monitored the usual sarcastic edit summaries from you. It is clear that you have failed to heed the warning left on your talk page by an administrator. I have thus initiated the procedure to re-open the RfC against you and to request administator intervention. ] (]) 15:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
: Really? Let's see what others think. --] (]) 16:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | : Really? Let's see what others think. --] (]) 16:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
::It's only ''your'' (biased) opinion that one of the comments was off topic. I completely disagree (and so, it would seem does ]). The other comment that you blanked was a legitimate response to an editor other than you who thought the switch was invented around the year 2000, so it wasn't even any of your damned business. ] (]) 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) | ::It's only ''your'' (biased) opinion that one of the comments was off topic. I completely disagree (and so, it would seem does ]). The other comment that you blanked was a legitimate response to an editor other than you who thought the switch was invented around the year 2000, so it wasn't even any of your damned business. ] (]) 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:06, 18 July 2012
This page has been edited.
Blatant violation of the rules.
You have taken to deleting other editor's comments from article talk pages. This is a flagrant violation of WP:BLANKING and can lead to you being blocked on its own. I have also monitored the usual sarcastic edit summaries from you. It is clear that you have failed to heed the warning left on your talk page by an administrator. I have thus initiated the procedure to re-open the RfC against you and to request administator intervention. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Really? Let's see what others think. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- It's only your (biased) opinion that one of the comments was off topic. I completely disagree (and so, it would seem does User:Andy Dingley). The other comment that you blanked was a legitimate response to an editor other than you who thought the switch was invented around the year 2000, so it wasn't even any of your damned business. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)