Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wtshymanski: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:06, 18 July 2012 editDieSwartzPunkt (talk | contribs)3,096 edits Blatant violation of the rules.: e← Previous edit Revision as of 17:14, 18 July 2012 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,122 edits r to throw-away user accountNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
: Really? Let's see what others think. --] (]) 16:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC) : Really? Let's see what others think. --] (]) 16:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
::It's only ''your'' (biased) opinion that one of the comments was off topic. I completely disagree (and so, it would seem does ]). The other comment that you blanked was a legitimate response to an editor other than you who thought the switch was invented around the year 2000, so it wasn't even any of your damned business. ] (]) 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) ::It's only ''your'' (biased) opinion that one of the comments was off topic. I completely disagree (and so, it would seem does ]). The other comment that you blanked was a legitimate response to an editor other than you who thought the switch was invented around the year 2000, so it wasn't even any of your damned business. ] (]) 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
::: Really? You do read English, don't you? You must read English, you've called yourself an authority on English usage at least once. Did you read the sentence in the switch talk page? <blockquote>Somewhere around Y2k, as part of researching the history of telegraphy and early electrical communication, I did an extensive Web search using all available search engines in a quest to identify the inventor of the first electrical switch.</blockquote> How did you interpret that as saying the switch was invented in 2000? Do you know what article talk pages are for? And profanity is against the rules, too, isn't it? --] (]) 17:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:14, 18 July 2012

This page has been edited.

Blatant violation of the rules.

You have taken to deleting other editor's comments from article talk pages. This is a flagrant violation of WP:BLANKING and can lead to you being blocked on its own. I have also monitored the usual sarcastic edit summaries from you. It is clear that you have failed to heed the warning left on your talk page by an administrator. I have thus initiated the procedure to re-open the RfC against you and to request administator intervention. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Really? Let's see what others think. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
It's only your (biased) opinion that one of the comments was off topic. I completely disagree (and so, it would seem does User:Andy Dingley). The other comment that you blanked was a legitimate response to an editor other than you who thought the switch was invented around the year 2000, so it wasn't even any of your damned business. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Really? You do read English, don't you? You must read English, you've called yourself an authority on English usage at least once. Did you read the sentence in the switch talk page?

Somewhere around Y2k, as part of researching the history of telegraphy and early electrical communication, I did an extensive Web search using all available search engines in a quest to identify the inventor of the first electrical switch.

How did you interpret that as saying the switch was invented in 2000? Do you know what article talk pages are for? And profanity is against the rules, too, isn't it? --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)