Revision as of 16:13, 27 July 2012 editBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,627 edits →July 2012: comment from blocking admin← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:14, 27 July 2012 edit undoFavonian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators287,595 edits Decline unblock requestNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ], as done at ]. If you have a registered Misplaced Pages username, you may ] and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ], as done at ]. If you have a registered Misplaced Pages username, you may ] and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | ||
{{unblock|South Africa publicly supported the Anglo-French military operation at the United Nations in New York ] (]) 16:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC) |
{{unblock reviewed | 1=South Africa publicly supported the Anglo-French military operation at the United Nations in New York ] (]) 16:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC) | decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that | ||
*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <u>or</u> | |||
*the block is no longer necessary because you | |||
*#understand what you have been blocked for, | |||
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and | |||
*#will make useful contributions instead. | |||
Please read the ] for more information. ] (]) 16:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
:You were blocked for edit-warring, not for the accuracy of the material you added to the article (without a source).--] (]) 16:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC) | :You were blocked for edit-warring, not for the accuracy of the material you added to the article (without a source).--] (]) 16:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:14, 27 July 2012
July 2012
Your recent editing history at Operation Musketeer (1956) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).92.10.140.17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
South Africa publicly supported the Anglo-French military operation at the United Nations in New York 92.10.140.17 (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Favonian (talk) 16:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You were blocked for edit-warring, not for the accuracy of the material you added to the article (without a source).--Bbb23 (talk) 16:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)