| Revision as of 06:12, 1 August 2012 view sourceEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,208 edits →Edit warring at Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:57, 1 August 2012 view source StillStanding-247 (talk | contribs)4,601 edits →Edit warring at Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012Next edit → | ||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The complete report of this case is at ]. ] (]) 06:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC) | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The complete report of this case is at ]. ] (]) 06:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock|reason=My edit comment and the comment on the talk page show that I was acting under the belief that WP:BLP beats out WP:3RR. Is this how you like to ] new editors who act in good faith? ] (]) 12:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 12:57, 1 August 2012
Welcome
|
Welcome to Misplaced Pages: check out the Teahouse!
|
Hello! StillStanding-247, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Misplaced Pages for new editors to ask questions about editing Misplaced Pages, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! |
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! Sarah (talk) 18:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
How to abuse a talk page.
In a recent post, Lionelt outlined a simple plan to get rid of me:
- Guy like that are just the cost of doing business at Misplaced Pages. Once his talkpage fills up with enough warnings and blocks someone will take him to ANI. He'll get a second chance, then a mentor, then another chance, then some kind of voluntary sanctions, then a topic ban, and when he finally realizes he won't be able to push his POV he'll disappear. Going by his edit frequency, this process will take a couple months. Just be patient, always warn him on his talk when he's disruptive, and never never edit war with him. That only engenders sympathy for him.– Lionel 07:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Not coincidentally, when I cleared my talk page, the person he was writing to immediately reverted my wipe. I think it's painfully obvious what's going on here.
I have nothing to hide; I'm proud of my small achievements here and I fully expect that some people will be unhappy with them. However, this talk page is not going to serve as a sewer for these people to fill with bogus notices intended to create the illusion of a pattern of disruptive editing. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 09:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
War on Women: "redefining rape"
Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Still-24-45-42-125. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
FYI
You have been mentioned here – Lionel 03:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring at Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Still-24-45-42-125 reported by User:Lionelt (Result: 24h). EdJohnston (talk) 06:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
StillStanding-247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My edit comment and the comment on the talk page show that I was acting under the belief that WP:BLP beats out WP:3RR. Is this how you like to WP:BITE new editors who act in good faith? Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My edit comment and the comment on the talk page show that I was acting under the belief that WP:BLP beats out WP:3RR. Is this how you like to ] new editors who act in good faith? ] (]) 12:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=My edit comment and the comment on the talk page show that I was acting under the belief that WP:BLP beats out WP:3RR. Is this how you like to ] new editors who act in good faith? ] (]) 12:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=My edit comment and the comment on the talk page show that I was acting under the belief that WP:BLP beats out WP:3RR. Is this how you like to ] new editors who act in good faith? ] (]) 12:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}