| Revision as of 04:20, 20 September 2012 editTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 edits +explanation← Previous edit |
Revision as of 04:21, 20 September 2012 edit undoTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 edits courtesy blankNext edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| ⚫ |
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|
|
<!--Template:Afd top |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
The result was '''speedy delete'''. This is basically A7 with a slight twist; for the reasons Chaser explained, I find the "valedictorian" claim to be implausible. I'd usually not, however, shut down an AfD early, but in this case I think allowing a likely false claim inserted by someone who, to put it charitably, does not have anything close to a good track record, to be associated with the subject is highly inappropriate; any impression that the subject himself inserted the false claim would be extremely damaging to him, and this is even more important given the creator's chosen username. I'm doing this deletion explicitly under ]. ] (]) 04:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
===]=== |
|
===]=== |
|
⚫ |
''The result of this discussion was '''delete'''. The actual discussion has been ] but can still be accessed by following the "history" link at the top of the page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). <span style="color:red">'''No further edits should be made to this page.'''</span>'' __NOINDEX__<!-- inserted using Template:afd-privacy --></div> |
|
|
|
|
:{{la|Sergio Urias}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) |
|
|
:({{Find sources|Sergio Urias}}) |
|
|
Mostly procedural nomination. Valedictorian at Harvard Law is enough of an assertion to notability that I'm not going to speedy this. But it's unusual such an achievement wouldn't be listed on someone's , and I've never heard of someone at a law school for an ]--often a one-year program--being declared the valedictorian. Any evidence of ]? Besides that, are the sources cited enough to satisfy our ]. I have no strong opinion yet. ] (]) 03:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Note'''; I've blocked the author of the article for legal threats. His other comments at the talkpage don't appear to really address the issues raised by Chaser. ] (]) 03:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|