| Revision as of 19:58, 3 May 2006 editMorton devonshire (talk | contribs)6,576 edits →User talk← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:40, 12 May 2006 edit undoRoyBoy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users39,646 edits Removed new section on Kevin TrudeauNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| You are invited to vote at ]. All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! ] 19:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | You are invited to vote at ]. All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! ] 19:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Removed new section on ] == | |||
| Hiya, I like your new section. But it can only be put back if you can find a verifiable source which mentions that criticism. - ]] <sup>]</sup> 15:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:40, 12 May 2006
Welcome!
Hello Deli nk/archive, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 11:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome.Deli nk 12:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
Welcome and Thanks
Welcome to wikipedia. Thanks for reverting Ariel Sharon to the correct version I was about to check to work out exactly which version to fix my revert up to as at first it seamed that IPs might of only vandalised but on realising it was -100 bytes I went to work out which version to revert to. You might want to join the counter vandalism unit If you need any help with anything (at your rate I dont think you will) just leave me a message on my talk page --Adam1213 Talk + 23:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Spam Link?
How is it a spam link? On Omega-3. It looked like a quality link to me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.41.37.146 (talk • contribs)
- You have repeatedly added links to that blog to multiple articles. It has been repeatedly and quickly removed by many different individuals. It's time you realized that the consensus is that a blog whose sole purpose seems to be to promote the use of fish oil and the sale of fish oil is not an appropriate reference for an encyclopedia article. If you have information to add to the articles, go ahead and add it. But when your only contibution to Misplaced Pages is doing nothing but adding links to the same website to articles over and over and over, you're a spammer. Deli nk 14:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- It's a blog I read regularly and it is highly relevant to fish oil. It is not my site. How am I a spammer? The site doesn't exist for the sole purpose of selling fish oil. In fact, they didn't even have ads on the site until a couple months ago. It seems you are on a witch hunt and are removing highly useful websites. Also, if you bothered to follow the discussions of the entries I edited, rather than just skimming my edit history, you would know that I am REMOVING spam links, not adding them. I challenge you to find me a website more relevant to fish oil than Fish Oil Blog. By removing it you are doing wikipedia users a disservice! The fact that ads exist does not mean it is solely for the purpose of selling fish oil. Do your research! I know it is effortful to bring a high level of discrimination to editing these entries, but Misplaced Pages users shouldn't suffer due to your laziness. You seem to be on a witch hunt and are speaking and acting entirely out of ignorance! --71.41.37.146 15:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- You seem to be missing the whole concept of consensus. Deli nk 18:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- It's a blog I read regularly and it is highly relevant to fish oil. It is not my site. How am I a spammer? The site doesn't exist for the sole purpose of selling fish oil. In fact, they didn't even have ads on the site until a couple months ago. It seems you are on a witch hunt and are removing highly useful websites. Also, if you bothered to follow the discussions of the entries I edited, rather than just skimming my edit history, you would know that I am REMOVING spam links, not adding them. I challenge you to find me a website more relevant to fish oil than Fish Oil Blog. By removing it you are doing wikipedia users a disservice! The fact that ads exist does not mean it is solely for the purpose of selling fish oil. Do your research! I know it is effortful to bring a high level of discrimination to editing these entries, but Misplaced Pages users shouldn't suffer due to your laziness. You seem to be on a witch hunt and are speaking and acting entirely out of ignorance! --71.41.37.146 15:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
== Spam Link? ==207.42.85.70 18:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Why are you removing a link that goes to a website that you can search "steel" and get over 5 thousand results of various steels. This would be good for any engineer who is interested in a specific type of steel with specific properties. I'm just trying to give people who are interested in steel more options.
- 207.42.85.70 14:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)If you look at the site, it's a database that is very useful to these products. It does not qualify as one of the links not to add. This site seems to have a lot of admins who just remove links. You may have looked at the link or you may not have. I have seen other materials that have links to sites like this. So if you don't remove those, then its unfair to remove mine. Understand that most people are trying to give links to good information that people can use.
Caffeine
I presume that you were trying to tidy up and somehow got the wrong version. I reverted the article to my last version again. The text the new users is trying to add is a copy and paste from a coffee company web site. --GraemeL 18:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Men's Wearhouse
I am not sure why you deleted that link at Men's Wearhouse—it certainly looks legitimate to me. Please advise. Cheers, Dick Clark 20:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
User talk
Just a friendly reminder, don't forget to sign your messages and warnings with four tildes to include your username as well as the date. Mrtea (talk) 17:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm...as far as I know, I have always signed my messages. Can you let me know where I didn't? Deli nk 11:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)
You are invited to vote at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! Morton devonshire 19:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Removed new section on Kevin Trudeau
Hiya, I like your new section. But it can only be put back if you can find a verifiable source which mentions that criticism. - RoyBoy 15:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)