Misplaced Pages

User talk:Alex Bakharev: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:05, 4 May 2006 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,198 edits Civility again← Previous edit Revision as of 20:07, 4 May 2006 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,198 editsm Civility againNext edit →
Line 78: Line 78:
::Ah yes, your standard tactic. You bring a frivolous complaint against someone on some Misplaced Pages noticeboard (as here ]). This complaint receives no support at all from the community. Then you proceed to solemnly cite how "you brought an issue to ]", implying to those unfamiliar with the issue that the complaint was valid. Please stop this. As for the rest of your comment, I was going to respond, but then I reconsidered: after all, you just provided more evidence for my point, saving me some work. ] 17:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC) ::Ah yes, your standard tactic. You bring a frivolous complaint against someone on some Misplaced Pages noticeboard (as here ]). This complaint receives no support at all from the community. Then you proceed to solemnly cite how "you brought an issue to ]", implying to those unfamiliar with the issue that the complaint was valid. Please stop this. As for the rest of your comment, I was going to respond, but then I reconsidered: after all, you just provided more evidence for my point, saving me some work. ] 17:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


:I completly support Balcer statement. I am also looking for someone to do mediation between Ghirlandajo nad Polish wikipedians community - if you are willing to give it a try, or know who would, please let me know. PS. I lost count how many times Ghirla has accused me of vanalising, attacking, insulting and related actions, or threatened me with desysoping. I don't know if Balcer or Halibutt keep track of insults directed them. But such ] are not my main concern - however Ghirla's reverting tactic in various content disputes are. When he damages the encyclopedic articles, it's an issue we have to deal with.--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 20:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC) :I completly support Balcer statement. I am also looking for someone to do mediation between Ghirlandajo nad Polish wikipedians community - if you are willing to give it a try, or know who would, please let me know. PS. I lost count how many times Ghirla has accused me of vandalising, attacking, insulting and related actions, or threatened me with desysoping. I don't know if Balcer or Halibutt keep track of insults directed them (a list of them from just a few months is listed on ], and his behaviour has certainly not changed since then). But such ] are not my main concern - however Ghirla's reverting tactic in various content disputes are. When he damages the encyclopedic articles, it's an issue we have to deal with.--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 20:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


==Thanks for voting on my RfA== ==Thanks for voting on my RfA==

Revision as of 20:07, 4 May 2006

Archives:


Bonaparte

Check out my recent reverts of him. He got smart!

P.S. Can you help me out with a Turkish version of him? She, coincidentally, is banned also. Current attacks are Turkish people and Zaza People. Thanks. —Khoikhoi 06:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

спасибо! —Khoikhoi 07:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Cool, how do you know if they'e open proxys (proxies?) or not? No, I don't see any more socks at the moment. Keep those pages on your watchlist. BTW, the reason for blocking the anon at Turks & Zazas wasn't to evade 3RR, she's already banned in the first place. I guess it's just ban evasion. All the best, —Khoikhoi 07:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Civility... Civility?

A-ha? And what do YOUR people say about this comment? I wasn't talking to this guy, I was outta here for months, I almost forgot of his existence, and what do I receive after my fisrt edit to controversial topic?! AlexPU 08:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

I say that you, AlexPU, was a fierce Russophobe and a fringe Ukrainian nationalist (fringe, because Ukrainians is not a nationalist nation) when I came here. And you became even more radical since then. FYI, I learned something while at Wiki. The best way to deal with trolls is not feed them. I will make a museum of your talk entries on my page without altering a word. Have a great day! --Irpen 08:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Guys, please do not escalate. There is a difference between calling some particular edits trollish (I do not want to discuss the merits of this) and calling somebody motherfucker. What would be next? We have to draw a line somehow.

Lets discuss the edits to the Soviet partisan article on the talk page of the article. abakharev 08:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Anna Golubkina, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man 19:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Football firm

There is currently some vandalism here, mostly Russia-related, from several IP's. Maybe, semi-block can help? MaxSem 15:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Ты можешь редактировать страницы? Если да, то убери Mad Judas Boys из FC Lokomotiv Moscow в разделе Football firm


Ognennïy angel

Grove has "Ognennïy angel" but I have no Russian! Have you seen the guidelines Misplaced Pages:Romanization of Russian and WP:CYR? What do they indicate? Kleinzach 17:09, 3 May 2006

(UTC) ый endings -y Красный = Krasny

according to guidelines Misplaced Pages:Romanization of Russian in has to be Ognenny angel The letter ï is not used there at all. I have a feeling that "Ognennyi angel" or even "Ognennyj angel"(a bit in German way) better explains the Russian prononciation than Ognenny angel. Probably it would be better to ask Alex Bakharev's opinion? What do you think?

Dear abakharev, Here is the question: which transliteration is better for wikipedia to use? Thanks in advance, Yours (Meladina 20:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC))

I find your lack of faith... disturbing.

Indulge. :)

Dear Alex Bakharev,

Thanks for voting on my RFA! I appreciate your comments and constructive criticism, for every bit helps me become a better Wikipedian. I've started working on the things you brought up, and I hope that next time, things run better; who knows, maybe one day we'll be basking on the shore of Admintopia together. Thanks and cheers, _-M o P-_ 22:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

The Fiery Angel (Prokofiev)

Arguably Ognenniy is closer to Russian pronunciation, but lets stick to the wikipedia guidelines. I have checked google, so Ognenny provides 57 references, Ognenniy provides 17 and Ognennïy provides 24. Thus, there is no single common spelling and Ognenny is even slightly more common than both Ognenniy and Ognennïy combine. The rules for romanization also gives Ognenny. So I think we should use Ognenny. abakharev 20:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Meladina"

Thanks for your opinion. I will probably follow your instruction. However, I've just found more than 100 references for "Ognennyi angel" on the same Google. (Meladina 22:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC))

IMPORTANT

FYI: Someone has been vandalizing the {indefblockeduser} template: it now reads "This user has been fucked by Administrators, Alex Trebek, or the Arbitration Comittee" Màglor 01:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Civility again

Since you are an admin that has expressed an interest in encouraging civility on Misplaced Pages (as in this diff), I wonder what you think about the recent edit on a prominent Portal:Russia/New article announcements page by User:Ghirlandajo, specifically this one. In it Ghirlandajo accused Piotrus, a respected admin, of "attacking" an article. He also accuses him of trying to recruit "revert warriors", when so far Ghirlandajo has been reverted precisely once, after he reverted all of Piotrus' changes on incorrect grounds that the article based on an almost exact copy of 1911 Britannica text is somehow stable (what does that mean?) and neutral (not so, there is even a special "1911POV" tag to reflect this). I could cite many other examples of what I consider Ghirlandajo's uncivil behaviour, but I hope this one will suffice, for now. Balcer 16:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Balcer, you have been told before that your delations and diatribes against me are both unmanly and boring. Your friend in arms, Piotrus, constantly uses the Polish notice-board to accuse me of "vandalism" (example). As we all know, the only practical purpose of the board's section on "articles vandalised" is to recruit revert warriors to push Polish prop by hook or by crook. After I have brought the issue to WP:ANI, Piotr now calls content disputes with me by a "V-word" (see Talk:Constantine Pavlovich). Your "respected admin" (in fact, your comrade in arms) deserves a stern warning for this. I have told him many times before that if he continues his disruptive activity he will be defrocked for wheel warring and other unspeakable offenses. Please take care, Ghirla 17:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Ah yes, your standard tactic. You bring a frivolous complaint against someone on some Misplaced Pages noticeboard (as here Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive94#Why should I be subjected to insults from admins on WP:AN3?). This complaint receives no support at all from the community. Then you proceed to solemnly cite how "you brought an issue to WP:ANI", implying to those unfamiliar with the issue that the complaint was valid. Please stop this. As for the rest of your comment, I was going to respond, but then I reconsidered: after all, you just provided more evidence for my point, saving me some work. Balcer 17:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
I completly support Balcer statement. I am also looking for someone to do mediation between Ghirlandajo nad Polish wikipedians community - if you are willing to give it a try, or know who would, please let me know. PS. I lost count how many times Ghirla has accused me of vandalising, attacking, insulting and related actions, or threatened me with desysoping. I don't know if Balcer or Halibutt keep track of insults directed them (a list of them from just a few months is listed on Ghirla's RfC, and his behaviour has certainly not changed since then). But such personal attacks are not my main concern - however Ghirla's reverting tactic in various content disputes are. When he damages the encyclopedic articles, it's an issue we have to deal with.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 20:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for voting on my RfA

File:Danavecpurpletiger.jpg Thank you for voting on my RFA! It passed 54/2/3, much better than I expected. In regards to your comment about me not having enough main space edits, I will attempt to find articles that I can contribute to. Thank you, I appreciate your thoughts. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 19:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)