| Revision as of 01:01, 20 November 2012 editDennis Brown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions69,230 edits →@ Dennis Brown: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:25, 20 November 2012 edit undoDennis Brown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions69,230 edits You have been blocked from editing for disruptive editing. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| *pick one of our talk page, but preferably not both. There needs to be an airgap between you two. I've said it. Calvin999/Aaron has just said it. Everyone knows this. There are only so many ways to achieve this. I prefer voluntary disengagement, and you know how I feel about interaction bans, so that limits the field a bit. As always, I would prefer you two figure out how to avoid each other so that blocks aren't necessary, but regardless of who did what, this has spilled into several areas of Misplaced Pages and has become ''disruptive''. Why no longer matters. Stopping it does. So I'm all ears if you have a solution. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 00:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC) | *pick one of our talk page, but preferably not both. There needs to be an airgap between you two. I've said it. Calvin999/Aaron has just said it. Everyone knows this. There are only so many ways to achieve this. I prefer voluntary disengagement, and you know how I feel about interaction bans, so that limits the field a bit. As always, I would prefer you two figure out how to avoid each other so that blocks aren't necessary, but regardless of who did what, this has spilled into several areas of Misplaced Pages and has become ''disruptive''. Why no longer matters. Stopping it does. So I'm all ears if you have a solution. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 00:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *We should just keep this at the ANI I suppose. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 01:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC) | *We should just keep this at the ANI I suppose. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 01:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for persistent ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 01:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | |||
Revision as of 01:25, 20 November 2012
November 2012
Please do not attack other editors, as you did to User_talk:Till. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Please don't call other editors assholes in edit summaries. NE Ent 02:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- You need to take a little break Till. Before the ANI was closed, I had already decided to extend one small bit of rope here. You have a real combative tone going on, lately, you haven't been as productive as you could be. Arguing with Bwilkins, and stuff like that, plus calling someone an asshole... Come on, you know you don't need to do that stuff. I don't like blocking users and do everything I can to NOT block them, but when you come back, if you start the same pattern, you won't leave me any choice but to react swiftly. There may be some blame to go around, but you seem to find a way to bring it on yourself. This is why you need a break, clear your head and come back with a more positive attitude. We all need breaks every now and then. I just came off one myself because my attitude wasn't what it should be. We want you here, but we need you to extend a bit more good faith and restraint when you are. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 02:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Dennis. Till 00:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Hellow
Hi, Till, your a great addition to Misplaced Pages, your contributions are always cohesive. No one deserves to be taunted personally. The incivility is just clouding your great contributions. Come back with a new approach or a new account maybe (but you would probably need a new IP address too) — a fresh start and you wouldn't be stalked anymore just a thought. By the way once I re-nominate the Moments (One Direction song) article for GA, I'm expecting you to review. Regards AdabowtheSecond 15:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Adabow, that was so sweet! Thank you for your words. I really didn't feel like making an edit until reading this. Till 23:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
GA nom of Diamonds
Tomica is right, it is too early to nominate. Perhaps jointly nominate it if you have both significantly contributed? AARON• 23:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- No it isn't, a GA can't be "too early to nominate". A GA can be nominated if it meets the criteria, which it does. Till 23:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah Calvin is right it's too early. Why don't you make right not like 20 edits on Unapologetic and nominated it? Come on go and do it, maybe it's the right time. I am removing the banner since I have a lot of supporters in that field. I am not doing anything wrong. See what Hahc21 with I Am... Sasha Fierce, he add Jivesh's as the biggest contributor, which I am on Diamonds actually. — Tomíca 23:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Again, you don't have to be the "biggest contributor" of an article to nominate it for GA. Please read the guidelines as noted at WP:GAN. Thank you. Till 23:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Do you know what edit history is? Do you know that when you click on that field there are few links and one of them is Biggest contributors? I am the biggest in the article. I basically wrote the whole article, you just made here and there edits, you didn't even wrote a section, how can you nominate it without telling me about the plan? Btw, that's not the only reason.It's too early... WE already explained you. — Tomíca 23:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Again, you don't have to be the "biggest contributor" of an article to nominate it for GA. Please read the guidelines as noted at WP:GAN. Thank you. Till 23:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah Calvin is right it's too early. Why don't you make right not like 20 edits on Unapologetic and nominated it? Come on go and do it, maybe it's the right time. I am removing the banner since I have a lot of supporters in that field. I am not doing anything wrong. See what Hahc21 with I Am... Sasha Fierce, he add Jivesh's as the biggest contributor, which I am on Diamonds actually. — Tomíca 23:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Actually both of you (Till and Tomica) are edit warring at Talk:Diamonds_(Rihanna_song) and should stop. NE Ent 23:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Tomica is reverting me for no reason. I am allowed to nominate the article for GA, why is that such a problem? Till 23:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- It's not, and as I just posted on their talk page, I'm not seeing any policy reason that allows his reverting. But you can't solve Misplaced Pages issues by edit warring -- it just gets you blocked and/or the page full protected. NE Ent 23:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- It can be early early Till, it's still making an impact on charts and very current. Promotion has began for the song and the album now. Music video has only just been released. The article needs to be stable and you need to wait for that to happen. I'm not taking sides I'm just saying that it can be too early. AARON• 00:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- It's not, and as I just posted on their talk page, I'm not seeing any policy reason that allows his reverting. But you can't solve Misplaced Pages issues by edit warring -- it just gets you blocked and/or the page full protected. NE Ent 23:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Um...
I'm a bit baffled at why you nominated "Diamonds". First off, you have produced almost none of what "your" representing. Additionally, this article is still too recent and will continue to be bombarded by additions in the near future (chart info, certifications, live performances). It should be removed immediately. I'll be taking the great joy of quick-failing it.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- I have never met you... so it's a bit rude to come to my talk page and accuse me of not being a major contributor to the article. I wrote a large portion of the chart performance, and have made significant copyedits to the article. Also anyone can nominate it for GA, it's not owned by any single editor. Till 23:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- You wrote 2 sentences from the Chart performance. User:Iluvrihanna24 wrote the Chart performance actually as it is now. You make like what? 10 edits for c/e with rude summaries. Meh — Tomíca 23:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- In case you didn't come to the conclusion, I looked over the edit summaries for the last 2 months. You've done literally nothing. Don't try and pass off crap with me. And no, Tommy and Aaron are friends of mine and I was shocked when I saw the BS you pulled. Lastly, hate to burst your bubble of confusion, but it's kind of a well known fact that you don't nominate or represent an article in GA/FA if you are not a main contributor (which you are far from).--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- You wrote 2 sentences from the Chart performance. User:Iluvrihanna24 wrote the Chart performance actually as it is now. You make like what? 10 edits for c/e with rude summaries. Meh — Tomíca 23:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
GAN
There is a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages talk:Good article nominations#Inappropriate quick-fail, you may wish to see it. TBrandley 00:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AARON• 00:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
@ Dennis Brown
I c/e'd the article which is why I nominated it. I actually expressed my interest with working with Tomica on the article, so I don't know where this "tormenting" is coming from! And I have been civil this entire time. For some reason, I can't edit other talk pages because of an autoblock. Till 00:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- pick one of our talk page, but preferably not both. There needs to be an airgap between you two. I've said it. Calvin999/Aaron has just said it. Everyone knows this. There are only so many ways to achieve this. I prefer voluntary disengagement, and you know how I feel about interaction bans, so that limits the field a bit. As always, I would prefer you two figure out how to avoid each other so that blocks aren't necessary, but regardless of who did what, this has spilled into several areas of Misplaced Pages and has become disruptive. Why no longer matters. Stopping it does. So I'm all ears if you have a solution. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- We should just keep this at the ANI I suppose. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)