Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Infowars.com: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:50, 11 May 2006 editJersey Devil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,830 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 21:56, 11 May 2006 edit undoKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits deleteNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
*'''Delete''' conspiracycruft. ] 21:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' conspiracycruft. ] 21:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', infowars.com is infact a notable website, passing ].--] 21:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''', infowars.com is infact a notable website, passing ].--] 21:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Unwarranted promo. Anything that could be covered here will already be covered in ] so this is unnecessary duplication. ] 21:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:56, 11 May 2006

Infowars.com

Fails Misplaced Pages:Notability (web), and brief. Some assertion of notability, so not speedy. The author is also up for AFD: Paul Joseph Watson, along with his other website. The JPS 13:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep One of the most prominent 9/11 truth movement websites, if this does not qualify as a notable, 9/11 truth website, then what does?--Striver 14:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
As can be seen , the site has a very high Alexa ranking considering the non-mainstream information it propagates. --Striver 14:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Is a Alexa rating of 10 000 for a conspirace site nn? How do you justify that? --Striver 19:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)