Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Infowars.com: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:56, 11 May 2006 editKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits delete← Previous edit Revision as of 22:38, 11 May 2006 edit undoZimZalaBim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers47,219 edits []: replyNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Delete''' Not sufficiently notable for mention beyond ] article. --] 17:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Not sufficiently notable for mention beyond ] article. --] 17:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
:Is a Alexa rating of 10 000 for a conspirace site nn? How do you justify that? --] 19:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC) :Is a Alexa rating of 10 000 for a conspirace site nn? How do you justify that? --] 19:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
::I don't hold Alexa ratings in as high of esteem as you apparently do, and neither do the ] guidelines. Traffic != notability. --] 22:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge and redirect''' to ]. The subject is notable - its Alexa rating is sufficiently high to merit an article. But there is so little information in this article that it should be merged without prejudice to the recreation of this article if its subsection on that the Alex Jones page becomes too large. --] 19:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Merge and redirect''' to ]. The subject is notable - its Alexa rating is sufficiently high to merit an article. But there is so little information in this article that it should be merged without prejudice to the recreation of this article if its subsection on that the Alex Jones page becomes too large. --] 19:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' conspiracycruft. ] 21:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' conspiracycruft. ] 21:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:38, 11 May 2006

Infowars.com

Fails Misplaced Pages:Notability (web), and brief. Some assertion of notability, so not speedy. The author is also up for AFD: Paul Joseph Watson, along with his other website. The JPS 13:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep One of the most prominent 9/11 truth movement websites, if this does not qualify as a notable, 9/11 truth website, then what does?--Striver 14:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
As can be seen , the site has a very high Alexa ranking considering the non-mainstream information it propagates. --Striver 14:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Is a Alexa rating of 10 000 for a conspirace site nn? How do you justify that? --Striver 19:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't hold Alexa ratings in as high of esteem as you apparently do, and neither do the Misplaced Pages:Notability (web) guidelines. Traffic != notability. --mtz206 22:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)