| Revision as of 00:42, 11 September 2002 editStephen Gilbert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,700 edits Answer to Mintguy← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:45, 21 December 2002 edit undoZundark (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers29,653 edits Lockerbie bombingNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :I've always known it as "Pan Am 103" too. A redirect from from ] would be appropriate. --] 00:42 Sep 11, 2002 (UTC) | :I've always known it as "Pan Am 103" too. A redirect from from ] would be appropriate. --] 00:42 Sep 11, 2002 (UTC) | ||
| It's usually "" rather than "". (The linked Google searches confirm this.) --] 09:45 Dec 21, 2002 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:45, 21 December 2002
In Britain this is usually referred to as the 'Lockerbie disaster'. I was tempted to move this page to that but, i'm wondering if it is usually referred to as 'Pan Am 103' in the US?
Lockerbie at the moment redirects to this page, which means the reference to Lockerbie found on this page refers to itself. I plan to make the page listed as Lockerbie have some brief information about the town and refer to the disaster. Is this acceptable to US readers? Mintguy 17:10 Sep 5, 2002 (PDT)
- The little TV news reporter in my head is saying "Pan Am flight 103, which exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988". Certainly the particular phrase "Lockerbie disaster" is unfamiliar. --Brion 16:21 Sep 10, 2002 (UTC)
- I've always known it as "Pan Am 103" too. A redirect from from Lockerbie disaster would be appropriate. --Stephen Gilbert 00:42 Sep 11, 2002 (UTC)
It's usually "Lockerbie bombing" rather than "Lockerbie disaster". (The linked Google searches confirm this.) --Zundark 09:45 Dec 21, 2002 (UTC)