| Revision as of 19:49, 23 December 2012 editKnowledgekid87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers96,740 edits →Archangel class assault ship: Re← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:32, 28 December 2012 edit undoMBisanz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users126,668 edits Closing debate, result was deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 04:32, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}} | |||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archangel class assault ship}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archangel class assault ship}}</ul></div> | ||
| :{{la|Archangel class assault ship}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Archangel class assault ship}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
| ::While I understand that the nominator was banned for being a sock that does not erase the issues this article has, there is no coverage to be found here. As for a merge if a list has non-notable unsourced fictional elements in it, then it should not be on wikipedia. - ] (]) 19:49, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | ::While I understand that the nominator was banned for being a sock that does not erase the issues this article has, there is no coverage to be found here. As for a merge if a list has non-notable unsourced fictional elements in it, then it should not be on wikipedia. - ] (]) 19:49, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', purely in-universe and no signs of external notability. ] ] 09:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', purely in-universe and no signs of external notability. ] ] 09:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 04:32, 28 December 2012
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz 04:32, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Archangel class assault ship
AfDs for this article:- Archangel class assault ship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional spaceship - no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Claritas § 08:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I am surprised that this even survived the last AfD, even with tons of Gundam related sources on my shelves, I don't find this notable. Also, it seems like the last AfD consensus tends towards a merge or delete but only kept because who initiated the AfD was blocked. But again, it simply showed that I like Gundam comment in the other AfD a complete lie. Just another WP:IDONTKNOWIT and WP:IDONTLIKEIT type of mass AfD wiki user. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearcher 09:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Zero wp:notability-suitable references on this fictional ship type. North8000 (talk) 12:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Fails per WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Nominator was found to have previous socked to attempt to delete this specific article, as is documented in the above, and as such should be perpetually ineligible for such a re-nomination. Failing that, it should be merged to a list of other non-notable fictional elements if the coverage is insufficient, per WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 20:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- While I understand that the nominator was banned for being a sock that does not erase the issues this article has, there is no coverage to be found here. As for a merge if a list has non-notable unsourced fictional elements in it, then it should not be on wikipedia. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, purely in-universe and no signs of external notability. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.