Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Puerto Rico/Assessment/Requests: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Puerto Rico | Assessment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:26, 2 January 2013 editAhnoneemoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,167 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 01:26, 2 January 2013 edit undoAhnoneemoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,167 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Auto archiving notice|ClueBot III}} {{Auto archiving notice|bot=ClueBot III|age=30}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Puerto Rico/Archives/ |archiveprefix=Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Puerto Rico/Archives/

Revision as of 01:26, 2 January 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Puerto Rico/Assessment/Requests redirect.
Puerto Rico articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 6 7
FL 1 2 4 7
FM 2 2
GA 7 16 63 86
B 15 82 151 175 7 430
C 24 103 219 486 42 874
Start 27 76 623 2,059 100 2,885
Stub 24 81 404 3,677 209 4,395
List 6 18 108 127 15 274
Category 2,655 2,655
Disambig 12 12
File 1,523 1,523
Portal 83 83
Project 20 20
Redirect 14 19 21 124 167 345
Template 155 155
NA 1 1 6 22 30
Other 19 19
Assessed 110 388 1,546 6,727 4,658 373 13,802
Unassessed 1 3 48 52
Total 111 388 1,546 6,730 4,658 421 13,854
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 45,753 Ω = 5.27

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Ramón Emeterio Betances

Gente, I need your honest reassessment. At the suggestion of Tony the Marine, I've almost given birth to a Betances clone... The article had a B rating before I put my hands on it. I want to improve the article's rating to Featured Article status, and have since submitted it to WikiProject peer review. However, since you're part of the concerned party, so to speak, feel free to fire away(!) Methinks it deserves an A, but I'm biased. Wink, wink... Of course, if this paragraph doesn't belong here, move it and let me know where it belongs. Demf 20:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Gracias, but what about Puerto Rico WikiProject ratings? I'd suggest High or Top importance... as quality goes, I've done my research for about an hour or so, and it probably deserves an GA, maybe even an A, but not Featured status yet. My wife is about to strangle me, all I do is talk about the guy since Thursday... ;-) Demf 21:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Not Top-importance, that is reserved for core topics (i.e. History of Puerto Rico); maybe High, due to his historical and internationally renowned impact and influences. But GOOD WORK, by the way. The article is really good. As Tony says, throw it through Peer Review; after that, I think it'll easily pass as a Good Article, except for a few touches here and there. - Mtmelendez 21:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Therefore, the ratings and importance would be...?(bites nails nervously) Demf 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I'd say High importance, this person is a notable historic subject which many students research from. As for quality, just put it as B to be conservative, but pass it through the GAN process. - Mtmelendez 12:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)