Misplaced Pages

Talk:Military camouflage: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:07, 3 January 2013 editChiswick Chap (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers296,345 edits archiving← Previous edit Revision as of 15:57, 7 January 2013 edit undoChiswick Chap (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers296,345 edits archiving...Next edit →
Line 19: Line 19:


] ] ] ]

==Uncited materials==

There were two uncited paragraphs from 'History', not sure where they came from. We shouldn't risk ] in such a developed article (if anywhere), so here they are. We can put them back once sources are found for them:

"The Americans introduced the spotted M42 "Frogskin" pattern for general issue in the Pacific. Wartime uniform camouflage patterns became the basis for many of the postwar patterns, but for most countries camouflage uniforms largely remained the province of special units well into the 1970s. The postwar US Army believed that a solid colour uniform provided better general protection, particularly for moving soldiers.<ref name=Brayley/> However, some republics of the Soviet Union embraced the general issue of camouflage uniforms to field troops. The ] was equipped with camouflage uniforms from its inception in 1956, making it the first modern army to issue a camouflage field uniform to all troops."{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}}

"The invention of radar and sonar primarily lead to various form of active countermeasures. It was not until the introduction of radar or sonar guided missiles that stealth technology developed in the 1960s and -70s. Use of missiles made engagement range for many types of combat well beyond visual range, and camouflage for ships and aircraft become less relevant. With the introduction of effective stealth technology came a renewed interest in camouflage patterns."{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}}
] (]) 10:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Revision as of 15:57, 7 January 2013

A summary of this article appears in camouflage.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
BThis article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

/Archive to 2011 /Archive 2012

Categories: