Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arjayay: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:59, 3 January 2013 editArjayay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers625,940 editsm Thanks: appreciated← Previous edit Revision as of 11:29, 10 January 2013 edit undoDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,961 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
]|Thanks for going way above and beyond your normal contributions in your reviewing and monitoring of a rather long and active article. Your participation (both past and future) is very much appreciated by myself ''and'' the encyclopedia. Cheers!!--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 18:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC) ]|Thanks for going way above and beyond your normal contributions in your reviewing and monitoring of a rather long and active article. Your participation (both past and future) is very much appreciated by myself ''and'' the encyclopedia. Cheers!!--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 18:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
:No problem - as you say it was "a long and active article", which made following the changes rather difficult; especially when, halfway through re-reading it, it was changed again - but as the changes were heading in the right direction, I was happy to let them run their course. As stated on the talk page, I was impressed by you and your fellow editors' ability to view the article from a NPoV.<br />] (]) 19:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC) :No problem - as you say it was "a long and active article", which made following the changes rather difficult; especially when, halfway through re-reading it, it was changed again - but as the changes were heading in the right direction, I was happy to let them run their course. As stated on the talk page, I was impressed by you and your fellow editors' ability to view the article from a NPoV.<br />] (]) 19:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for January 10==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:29, 10 January 2013


Archives

Music to Dec 2012
Spelling to Dec 2012
Other to Dec 2012



A Gnome Explains

It's a silly WikiGnome story:-
I found that I had misspelt retrieved, as retreived (ei), three times in one article (one mistake, copied & pasted).
I set myself a "penance" (nothing like a bit of masochism) of correcting the "ei" versions in Misplaced Pages articles.
I only intended to do the 100 or so misspellings there were at the time, but I then adopted "retrieved" (retreived, retrived, retreved)
I then added "rhythm” (rhythem, rhythim, rhythym, rhytm, rythem, rythim, rythm & rythym)

I have since got carried away, and adopted the Misplaced Pages:Lists of common misspellings/R - all of it.
Don’t do it, it's bad for your health




Thanks

|Thanks for going way above and beyond your normal contributions in your reviewing and monitoring of a rather long and active article. Your participation (both past and future) is very much appreciated by myself and the encyclopedia. Cheers!!-- — KeithbobTalk18:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem - as you say it was "a long and active article", which made following the changes rather difficult; especially when, halfway through re-reading it, it was changed again - but as the changes were heading in the right direction, I was happy to let them run their course. As stated on the talk page, I was impressed by you and your fellow editors' ability to view the article from a NPoV.
Arjayay (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andha Kanoon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)