Misplaced Pages

Hebephilia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:59, 3 January 2013 view sourceFormerIP (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,570 edits →DSM-5: Unsourced, slanted.← Previous edit Revision as of 01:02, 4 January 2013 view source Literaturegeek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,070 edits Rv. This is among the main arguments against it being a mental disorder - adding sources. There is consensus that young adolescents need legal protection from exploitative and predatory adults.Next edit →
Line 13: Line 13:


==DSM-5== ==DSM-5==
In 2008, ] was the lead<!--and corresponding--> author of an influential paper proposing the introduction of hebephilia in the ].<ref name=Blanchard/> The paper, coauthored mostly<!--with the exception of A.D. Lykins, but she seems rather obscure to mention--> with colleagues from ] and the ], triggered a number of reactions. Critics include ],<ref name=green>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9602-7}}</ref> ] (] editor),<ref name=cpn>Joyce Frieden (Dec 1, 2009) , Clinical Psychiatry News, Elsevier</ref> ],<ref name="franklin">{{cite doi|10.1002/bsl.934}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9425-y}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9616-1}}</ref> and ],<ref name=moser>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9436-8}}</ref> while others like ] argue that the proposal does not go far enough.<ref name=Donohue>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5}}</ref> Clinical psychologist Joseph J. Plaud<ref>http://psyris.com/drjoeplaud</ref> criticized Blanchard's study for lacking a control group of "normal" men, and other methodological issues, leading him to conclude that "The data do not support the conclusions reached in this article, especially the inclusion of a significant change to the DSM-5".<ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9423-0}}</ref> Blanchard replied to these concerns.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9427-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7}}</ref> Franklin maintains a list of publications discussing the new diagnosis.<ref>http://www.karenfranklin.com/hebephilia.html</ref> In 2008, ] was the lead<!--and corresponding--> author of an influential paper proposing the introduction of hebephilia in the ].<ref name=Blanchard/> The paper, coauthored mostly<!--with the exception of A.D. Lykins, but she seems rather obscure to mention--> with colleagues from ] and the ], triggered a number of reactions, many of them critical on the basis that it pathologizes reproductively valid behavior in order to uphold current social and legal standards.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/hebephilia |title=Hebephilia |year=2012 |publisher=] |location=USA }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Richard Green |year=2010 |title=Hebephilia is a Mental Disorder? |journal=Sexual Offender Treatment |volume=5 |issue=1 |publisher=Sexual Offender Treatment |url=http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/2-2010_01.html }}</ref> Critics include ],<ref name=green>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9602-7}}</ref> ] (] editor),<ref name=cpn>Joyce Frieden (Dec 1, 2009) , Clinical Psychiatry News, Elsevier</ref> ],<ref name="franklin">{{cite doi|10.1002/bsl.934}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9425-y}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9616-1}}</ref> and ],<ref name=moser>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9436-8}}</ref> while others like ] argue that the proposal does not go far enough.<ref name=Donohue>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5}}</ref> Clinical psychologist Joseph J. Plaud<ref>http://psyris.com/drjoeplaud</ref> criticized Blanchard's study for lacking a control group of "normal" men, and other methodological issues, leading him to conclude that "The data do not support the conclusions reached in this article, especially the inclusion of a significant change to the DSM-5".<ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9423-0}}</ref> Blanchard replied to these concerns.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-008-9427-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7}}</ref> Franklin maintains a list of publications discussing the new diagnosis.<ref>http://www.karenfranklin.com/hebephilia.html</ref>


The proposed DSM-5 replacement for the pedophilia diagnosis, called ], largely reflected the proposal of Blanchard and his colleagues.<ref name=dsm5>http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=186</ref> The naming of the new disorder also reflects the more general distinction proposed between ] and ] in DSM-5. The proposed DSM-5 replacement for the pedophilia diagnosis, called ], largely reflected the proposal of Blanchard and his colleagues.<ref name=dsm5>http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=186</ref> The naming of the new disorder also reflects the more general distinction proposed between ] and ] in DSM-5.

Revision as of 01:02, 4 January 2013

Hebephilia is defined as a primary or exclusive sexual interest in pubescent individuals aged approximately 11–14 years. Hebephilia differs from ephebophilia, which refers to the sexual preference for individuals in later adolescence, and from pedophilia, which refers to the sexual preference for prepubescent children. The onset of puberty varies from child to child, but, on average, girls begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11; boys at age 11 or 12. While individuals with a sexual preference for adults (i.e., teleiophiles) may have some sexual interest in pubescent-aged individuals, the term hebephilia is reserved for those who prefer pubescent-aged individuals over adults. The term was introduced by Glueck (1955), who later credited it, without citation, to Paul Benedict.

Ray Blanchard and a number of his colleagues from CAMH believe that hebephilia is a mental disorder and argued for its inclusion in the DSM-5. The proposed addition to the DSM V was criticized by Richard Green, Allen Frances, Michael First (DSM-IV editor), Karen Franklin, Charles Allen Moser, William O'Donohue, and other mental health professionals on various grounds. The American Psychiatric Association rejected the addition of hebephilia to the DSM-5 as a diagnosable psychiatric disorder.

Etiology and etymology

As with sexual preference in general, it is not known what causes someone to prefer a pubescent rather than an adult individual for sexual reasons. A number of biological associations have been studied however. A team from CAMH has published a series of research articles comparing biologically relevant characteristics of clinical samples of pedophiles, hebephiles, and teleiophiles (individuals with a sexual preference for adults). In such samples, hebephilic men are midway between pedophilic men and teleiophilic men on average IQ, memory test scores, and rates of school grade failures over and above the IQ differences, with pedophiles scoring the lowest on the first two measures and highest on the third. Hebephiles score midway between pedophiles and teleiophiles in rates of non-right-handedness, rates of having suffered childhood head injuries, and physical height.

The name is based on the Greek goddess of youth Hebe, a daughter of Zeus and Hera. She is also known as Ganymeda, or in Roman: Juventas. Words such as juvenile are based on that form. The suffix -phil- based on Philia is also Greek, meaning love.

Prevalence of hebephilia versus pedophilia

There are clinical and correctional samples of sexual offenders in which hebephilic men outnumber the pedophilic men. Moreover, anonymous surveys of people sexually interested in children more frequently report an erotic interest in pubescents rather than in prepubescents.

DSM-5

In 2008, Ray Blanchard was the lead author of an influential paper proposing the introduction of hebephilia in the DSM-5. The paper, coauthored mostly with colleagues from CAMH and the University of Toronto, triggered a number of reactions, many of them critical on the basis that it pathologizes reproductively valid behavior in order to uphold current social and legal standards. Critics include Richard Green, Michael First (DSM-IV editor), Karen Franklin, and Charles Allen Moser, while others like William O'Donohue argue that the proposal does not go far enough. Clinical psychologist Joseph J. Plaud criticized Blanchard's study for lacking a control group of "normal" men, and other methodological issues, leading him to conclude that "The data do not support the conclusions reached in this article, especially the inclusion of a significant change to the DSM-5". Blanchard replied to these concerns. Franklin maintains a list of publications discussing the new diagnosis.

The proposed DSM-5 replacement for the pedophilia diagnosis, called pedohebophilic disorder, largely reflected the proposal of Blanchard and his colleagues. The naming of the new disorder also reflects the more general distinction proposed between paraphilia and paraphilic disorder in DSM-5.

At the annual meeting of the American Association of Psychiatry and Law (AAPL) a group of forensic psychiatrists working with sex offenders made a symbolic vote on the inclusion of Pedohebephilia in DSM-5, with 2 votes for and 31 against. At the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders meeting in Oslo another vote was made with 1 vote for and 100 against. The proposed addition of hebephilia to the DSM-5 diagnostic codes and appendix was rejected by the American Psychiatric Association board of trustees due to a large degree of opposition to the proposed new diagnosis and concerns about its scientific validity. The AMA board of trustees apparently had to step in due to a small group of psychologists digging their heels in and not accepting the opinions of the wider community of mental health professionals.

See also

References

  1. Krafft-Ebing, R., & Moll, A. (1924). Psychopathia sexualis. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
  2. Krafft-Ebing, R. von. (1886). Psychopathia sexualis: A medico-forensic study (1965 trans by H. E. Wedeck). New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
  3. (Chumlea, 1982).
  4. "For girls, puberty begins around 10 or 11 years of age and ends around age 16. Boys enter puberty later than girls-usually around 12 years of age-and it lasts until around age 16 or 17." "Teenage Growth & Development: 11 to 14 Years". Palo Alto Medical Foundation. Retrieved August 15, 2011.
  5. Freund, K., Langevin, R., Cibiri, S., & Zajac, Y. (1973). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males. British Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 163–169.
  6. Glueck, B. C., Jr. (1955). Final report: Research project for the study and treatment of persons convicted of crimes involving sexual aberrations. June 1952 to June 1955. New York: New York State Department of Mental Hygiene.
  7. Hammer, E. F., & Glueck, B. C. (1957). Psychodynamic factors in sex offenders: A four-factor theory. Psychiatric Quarterly, 31, 325–345.
  8. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9 instead.
  9. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9602-7, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-010-9602-7 instead.
  10. ^ Allen Frances, Michael B. First, (2011) Hebephilia Is Not a Mental Disorder in DSM-IV-TR and Should Not Become One in DSM-5 J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 39:1:78-85
  11. ^ Joyce Frieden (Dec 1, 2009) DSM-V work on paraphilias begins in earnest, Clinical Psychiatry News, Elsevier
  12. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1002/bsl.934, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1002/bsl.934 instead.
  13. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9436-8, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-008-9436-8 instead.
  14. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5 instead.
  15. ^ Karen Franklin (December 2, 2012). "Psychiatry Rejects Novel Sexual Disorder "Hebephilia"". USA: Psychology Today. Retrieved December 6, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  16. ^ Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Christensen, B. K., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., Beckstead, A. L., et al. (2004). Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology, 18, 3–14.
  17. Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2006). Grade failure and special education placement in sexual offenders’ educational histories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 743–751.
  18. Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., et al. (2005). Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 447–459.
  19. Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Cantor, J. M., & Blak, T. (2003). Self-reported injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and non-pedophilic men referred for clinical assessment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 573–581.
  20. Blanchard, R., Christensen, B. K., Strong, S. M., Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., & Blak, T. (2002). Retrospective self-reports of childhood accidents causing unconsciousness in phallometrically diagnosed pedophiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 511–526.
  21. Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Physical height in pedophilia and hebephilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 395–407.
  22. Gebhard, P. H., Gagnon, J. H., Pomeroy, W. B., & Christenson, C. V. (1965). Sex offenders: An analysis of types. New York: Harper & Row.
  23. Studer, L. H., Aylwin, A. S., Clelland, S. R., Reddon, J. R., & Frenzel, R. R. (2002). Primary erotic preference in a group of child molesters. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 173–180.
  24. Bernard, F. (1975). An enquiry among a group of pedophiles. The Journal of Sex Research, 11, 242–255.
  25. Wilson, G. D., & Cox, D. N. (1983). Personality of paedophile club members. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 323–329.
  26. "Hebephilia". USA: Psychology Today. 2012.
  27. Richard Green (2010). "Hebephilia is a Mental Disorder?". Sexual Offender Treatment. 5 (1). Sexual Offender Treatment.
  28. Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9425-y, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-008-9425-y instead.
  29. Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9616-1, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-010-9616-1 instead.
  30. http://psyris.com/drjoeplaud
  31. Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9423-0, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-008-9423-0 instead.
  32. Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9427-9, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-008-9427-9 instead.
  33. Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7 instead.
  34. http://www.karenfranklin.com/hebephilia.html
  35. http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=186
  36. Franklin, K. 2011. "Forensic Psychiatrists Vote No on Proposed Paraphilias", Psychiatric Times. Vol. 27 No. 12

External links

Pedophilia and child sexual abuse
Associated chronophilias
Behavior and legal aspects
By country
Treatment methods
Research and support groups
Prevention organizations
Social views
Related
Category: